2012
DOI: 10.5708/ejmh.7.2012.2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determinants of Teachers’ Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Mental Fatigue

Abstract: In recent years, many studies have focused on the determinants and consequences of teacher stress. One of the most recent theoretical models concerning stress is the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. This study examines one process -namely the energetic process -which supposes that high job demands exhaust employees' mental and physical resources and therefore cause ill health. Particularly, this study examines the mediating role of mental fatigue between three job demands of teachers (workload, inequity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, several job characteristics, such as workload, job insecurity, emotional labor, emotional investment in students’ behavioral problems, and demanding interactions with parents, are associated with WFC among teachers (Cinamon et al, 2007; Noor and Zainuddin, 2011; Ilies et al, 2015; Richter et al, 2015; see also Michel et al, 2011, for a meta-analysis across different occupations). WFC may in turn have negative consequences for both teachers and their students, in terms of teachers’ job burnout, poorer psychological and physical health, reduced organizational citizenship behaviors and job satisfaction, as well as lower students’ perceived teacher autonomy support and autonomous motivation (Bragger et al, 2005; Cinamon and Rich, 2010; Bell et al, 2012; Guglielmi et al, 2012; Gao et al, 2013; Haslam et al, 2013; Santisi et al, 2014; Benevene and Fiorilli, 2015; Fiorilli et al, 2015; Shen et al, 2015; Bélanger et al, 2016; see also Amstad et al, 2011, for a meta-analysis across different occupations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several job characteristics, such as workload, job insecurity, emotional labor, emotional investment in students’ behavioral problems, and demanding interactions with parents, are associated with WFC among teachers (Cinamon et al, 2007; Noor and Zainuddin, 2011; Ilies et al, 2015; Richter et al, 2015; see also Michel et al, 2011, for a meta-analysis across different occupations). WFC may in turn have negative consequences for both teachers and their students, in terms of teachers’ job burnout, poorer psychological and physical health, reduced organizational citizenship behaviors and job satisfaction, as well as lower students’ perceived teacher autonomy support and autonomous motivation (Bragger et al, 2005; Cinamon and Rich, 2010; Bell et al, 2012; Guglielmi et al, 2012; Gao et al, 2013; Haslam et al, 2013; Santisi et al, 2014; Benevene and Fiorilli, 2015; Fiorilli et al, 2015; Shen et al, 2015; Bélanger et al, 2016; see also Amstad et al, 2011, for a meta-analysis across different occupations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Italian teachers are in the last positions for the perceived social recognition of the profession (OCDE, 2014). Furthermore, in 2015 the Italian National Observatory on Health and Well-being of Teachers (ONSBI—Osservatorio Nazionale Salute e Benessere degli Insegnanti) research study highlighted the low satisfaction of the category for the physical (Guglielmi et al, 2012) and organizational conditions of schools (Fiorilli et al, 2015b). Although the OBSBI study was able to assess the risk levels of teachers' physical and psychological health and the factors that influence them, it was not very informative with respect to the factors that contribute to generating a condition of well-being among teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular theories are the role stress theory ( Kahn et al, 1964 ), the conservation of resources theory ( Hobfoll, 1989 ), and the JD–R model ( Bakker and Demerouti, 2007 ). Nonetheless, WFC has been conceptualized differently and, consequently, has been located in the stressor–strain chain as either an independent (e.g., Schaufeli et al, 2009 ; Guglielmi et al, 2012 ), dependent (e.g., Bakker and Geurts, 2004 ; Boyar et al, 2014 ), or intervening variable (e.g., Peeters et al, 2004 , 2005 ). Following the recommendation of Peeters et al (2004) to distinguish the concept clearly from other job demands, we decided to view WFC as an intervening variable and integrate it as such into the JD–R model as our theoretical framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%