2006
DOI: 10.28945/398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Implementation of Learning Objects in a Higher Education Setting

Abstract: With the increase in offshore and off-campus demand for University of Tasmania degrees, lecturers have become aware of the need to develop more flexible delivery processes which add value to the student learning experience and provide teaching staff with opportunities for greater creativity in the teaching process. The three cases described will outline a model guiding Learning Object development and teaching within the School of Information Systems and will describe the process of student interaction and resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Placing this work in context of the studies conducted within the Informing Science framework, the paper addresses the need for designing theory informed and technology-enabled tutorial activities for students (Salas & Ellis, 2006), encouraging the development of virtual communities of practice (Dube, Bourhis, & Jacob, 2006), and understanding how collaboration supports knowledge building, which in turn supports the development of learning objects and technical scaffolds (Convertini et al, 2006). The model of the CKB process presented here needs to be further corroborated with data to develop a cohesive theory and model of CKB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placing this work in context of the studies conducted within the Informing Science framework, the paper addresses the need for designing theory informed and technology-enabled tutorial activities for students (Salas & Ellis, 2006), encouraging the development of virtual communities of practice (Dube, Bourhis, & Jacob, 2006), and understanding how collaboration supports knowledge building, which in turn supports the development of learning objects and technical scaffolds (Convertini et al, 2006). The model of the CKB process presented here needs to be further corroborated with data to develop a cohesive theory and model of CKB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been pointed out that development of independent skills for deeper learning may be encouraged where students have opportunities for experimentation (see e.g. de Salas & Ellis, 2006). This is recognized and supported in SSL, since the approach supports individual students to create and develop their own independent learning processes.…”
Section: Strategic Systemic Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Learning Objects allow for the creation of highly effective learning experiences for students [10] and enhancing the student learning environment [13]; • The choice of which Learning Objects to assemble into a collection can be a decision made in advance by an instructional designer or at the moment by a student [14]; • Learning Objects allow experiences in problemsolving and exploration and collaboration with fellow learners [14]; • Learning Objects allow universal access to online instructional materials; • Learning Objects provide solutions for individualizing learning [10].…”
Section: Benefits To Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%