The Development of Inhibition of Return in Early Infancy

Clohessy, Anne B.; Posner, Michael I.; Rothbart, Mary K.; Vecera, Shaun P.

doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.345

Cited by 114 publications

(95 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A similar finding was reported by Clohessy, Posner, Rothart, and Vecera (1991), who tested infants. In a recent study, Gibson and Egeth (l994a) found evidence for lOR in a temporal order judgment task.…”

supporting

confidence: 89%

Inhibition of return in a discrimination task

Pratt

1995

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inhibition of return (lOR) refers to a bias against returning visual attention to a location that has been recently attended. Although lOR has been demonstrated in a wide range of detection tasks, it has not been reliably shown in discrimination tasks. The results of the present experiment, in which eye movement responses and a cue-target procedure were used, indicate that lOR can exist in a discrimination task. Moreover, the results indicate that the amount oflOR in the discrimination task was approximately equal to that found in the detection task. The results suggest that lOR will be obtained in a discrimination task if the prior allocation of attention does not yield any useful information concerning the forthcoming discrimination judgment.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 89%

Inhibition of return in a discrimination task

Pratt

1995

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…multaneous location cues Posner & Cohen, 1984), age (Clohessy, Posner, Rothbart, & Vecera, 1991), and even personality (Avila, 1995). In addition to these factors, the accuracy of the information provided by a cue has also been reported to influence visual lOR, with the inhibitory component apparently being eliminated when the likelihood that the cue provides accurate spatial information is better than chance (see, e.g., Klein & Taylor, 1994;Rafal et aI., 1989;Rafal & Henik, 1994).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return

Mondor

1999

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The possibility that the time-course of auditory inhibition of return (lOR) might depend on the temporal or spatial predictability of the cue-target relation was investigated. In all the experiments, a location cue was followed by a target that was to be localized.An inhibitory effect became apparent ata longer stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) when either the temporal or the spatial relation was predictable, rather than when either was unpredictable. A facilitative effect was apparent at a lOO-msec SOA, irrespective of the predictability of the cue-target relation. These results establish that the timecourse of the inhibitory component oflocation-based auditory lOR depends on the predictability ofthe temporal and spatial relations of cue and target. The theoretical implications of these results are considered, and a dual-process model of auditory selective attention is offered.Audition was, at one time, the modality of choice with regard to presenting information to study selective attention, and early models were based largely on the results of such experiments (e.g., Broadbent, 1957;Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963;Moray, 1974;Norman, 1968;Treisman, 1970). However, audition was soon replaced by vision as the preferred modality of study, with the result that, whereas much is now known about the selection of visual information, relatively little is known about the selection of auditory information. Interest in auditory selective attention has, however, been renewed in the last few years (e.g., Hafter, Schlauch, & Tang, 1993;Mondor & Bregman, 1994;Mondor & Bryden, 1992;Mondor & Zatorre, 1995;Rhodes, 1987;Scharf, Quigley, Aoki, Peachey, & Reeves, 1987;Spence & Driver, 1994;Woods, 1990). Much of this recent research has relied on a simple paradigm in which a single cue is presented, followed by a single target, about which listeners are required to make some type of detection or identification judgment. Usually, the time period between the onset of the cue and the onset of the target (stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA]) and the similarity of the cue and the target are examined for their effect on the speed and accuracy of responding to the target. This research has established, among other things, that the effect on performance of uninformative spatial and frequency cues varies as a function of SOA. Specifically, relative to performance for targets that differ from the preceding cue, performance for targets that are similar

show abstract

“…Posner and Cohen (1984) originally suggested that the ICE evoked by peripheral cues was the result of sensory stimulation (i.e., an input-based effect). Posner et al (1985), however, found that this ICE had no effect on the perceptual arrival time of targets (see also Klein, Schmidt, & Müller, 1998;Maylor, 1985) but, nevertheless, biased eye movements away (see also Clohessy, Posner, Rothbart, & Vecera, 1991). These findings suggest that the observed ICE may actually represent a motor bias against previously attended locations (i.e., an outputbased effect).…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues

Ding

Satel

et al. 2016

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With two cueing tasks, in the present study we examined output-based inhibitory cueing effects (ICEs) with manual responses to arrow targets following manual or saccadic responses to arrow cues. In all experiments, ICEs were observed when manual localization responses were required to both the cues and targets, but only when the cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA) was 2,000 ms or longer. In contrast, when saccadic responses were made in response to the cues, ICEs were only observed with CTOAs of 2,000 ms or less-and only when an auditory cue-back signal was used. The present study also showed that the magnitude of ICEs following saccadic responses to arrow cues decreased with time, much like traditional inhibition-of-return effects. The magnitude of ICEs following manual responses to arrow cues, however, appeared later in time and had no sign of decreasing even 3 s after cue onset. These findings suggest that ICEs linked to skeletomotor activation do exist and that the ICEs evoked by oculomotor activation can carry over to the skeletomotor system.

show abstract

The Development of Inhibition of Return in Early Infancy

Cited by 114 publications

References 7 publications

Inhibition of return in a discrimination task

Inhibition of return in a discrimination task

Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return

Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About