2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Spatial Skills in Elementary School Students

Abstract: Through five waves of data collection, this longitudinal study investigated the development of spatial skills in 304 elementary school children (M = 7.64 years) as they progressed from the second to fourth grade. The study focused on whether multiple latent classes with different developmental profiles best explain development. Spatial skills were measured by tests featuring two-dimensional figures. Mathematics achievement was measured by the statewide end-of-year test and was included as a distal outcome vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, early spatial visualisation (a task which requires input from a number of spatial subdomains) at age three was found to be a significant predictor of arithmetic at age 10 (Zhang et al, 2014). Furthermore, a composite measure of spatial performance (assessing performance on a range of spatial sub-domains) at age 7 significantly predicted mathematics achievement levels at approximately 10 years (Carr et al, 2017). Similarly, Casey and colleagues (2015) reported, in a study with girls, that spatial skills (a composite measure generated from block design and mental transformation tasks) at age 7 were significant predictors of mathematics reasoning at age 11.…”
Section: Spatial Ability and Success In Mathematics In Child Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, early spatial visualisation (a task which requires input from a number of spatial subdomains) at age three was found to be a significant predictor of arithmetic at age 10 (Zhang et al, 2014). Furthermore, a composite measure of spatial performance (assessing performance on a range of spatial sub-domains) at age 7 significantly predicted mathematics achievement levels at approximately 10 years (Carr et al, 2017). Similarly, Casey and colleagues (2015) reported, in a study with girls, that spatial skills (a composite measure generated from block design and mental transformation tasks) at age 7 were significant predictors of mathematics reasoning at age 11.…”
Section: Spatial Ability and Success In Mathematics In Child Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is evidence from children aged 10 and 11 years, that intrinsic‐static spatial skills (measured using disembedding and matrix reasoning tasks respectively) are significantly correlated with mathematics outcomes (0.37 < r < 0.42) (Markey, ; Tosto et al., ). Similarly, both intrinsic‐static skills (age 3 years) and performance on composite spatial measures (requiring the use of a range of spatial sub‐domains) at age 7 years, are significant longitudinal predictors of mathematics at approximately 10 years (0.31 < r < 0.49) (Carr et al., ; Casey et al., ; Zhang et al., ). These findings suggest that associations between spatial thinking and mathematics in the primary school years may not be limited to the intrinsic‐dynamic spatial domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a recent longitudinal study investigated the developmental trajectories of the predictive relationship between spatial ability and early numerical skills in elementary school children as they progressed from the second to fourth grade (Carr et al, 2018). The authors showed that spatial skills development presents two developmental profiles predicted by socioeconomic status, verbal working memory, and gender; in turn the developmental profiles predicted differences in mathematics achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover several domain-general factors, such as attentional, perceptive, memory, motor and linguistic processes (and their sub-processes), have also been found to contribute to both learning skills precursors and subsequent scholastic competences (for example, D’Amico and Guarnera, 2005; McCutchen, 2005; Ecalle et al, 2008; Commodari and Di Blasi, 2014; Guarnera and D’Amico, 2014; Carr et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%