2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of sub-surface damage during high energy solid particle erosion of a thermally sprayed WC–Co–Cr coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the largest increase in hardness occurs from 2 to 3 torch scans, whereas, at higher number of scans, the increase is less remarkable. The hardness of the 2-scan coating is significantly lower than the values reported in the pertinent literature for analogous HVOF-sprayed WC-CoCr coatings [13,25], whereas the hardness of the coatings with 3 or more scans approaches or overcomes 1100HV 0.1 , which is comparable to goodquality cermet coatings [13,25]. The presence or absence of the Ni bond coat (samples with bond coat are identified by the label "bc") does not affect the hardness of WC-CoCr layers significantly, except, maybe, for the 2-scan coating.…”
Section: Microstructural and Micromechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Specifically, the largest increase in hardness occurs from 2 to 3 torch scans, whereas, at higher number of scans, the increase is less remarkable. The hardness of the 2-scan coating is significantly lower than the values reported in the pertinent literature for analogous HVOF-sprayed WC-CoCr coatings [13,25], whereas the hardness of the coatings with 3 or more scans approaches or overcomes 1100HV 0.1 , which is comparable to goodquality cermet coatings [13,25]. The presence or absence of the Ni bond coat (samples with bond coat are identified by the label "bc") does not affect the hardness of WC-CoCr layers significantly, except, maybe, for the 2-scan coating.…”
Section: Microstructural and Micromechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Further, these two coatings also exhibit significant interlamellar interface damages. As part of the impact energy is transferred through the thickness of the coatings, it gets distributed at the inter-lamellar interfaces, and a significant amount of the energy is consumed in the opening of these interfaces [27]. Depending on their character, the response and affected zone is different.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the hardness of WS coatings affects the wear property of them more strongly. Previous studies (Ref [24][25][26] about erosion of thermal sprayed cermet coatings described the erosion mechanism as follows. The first is microcutting and microploughing of the soft binder by hard erodent particles.…”
Section: Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%