1996
DOI: 10.5926/jjep1953.44.1_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Developmental Change of Friendship in Adolescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boys usually do not consult others about their problems and, when they do, they only talk to their friends. These findings are consistent with the following results of studies: significant differences in friendships among adolescent boys and girls [17,18], and gender differences in personal relations with friends due to their developmental stages [6,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Boys usually do not consult others about their problems and, when they do, they only talk to their friends. These findings are consistent with the following results of studies: significant differences in friendships among adolescent boys and girls [17,18], and gender differences in personal relations with friends due to their developmental stages [6,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean for boys was higher than for girls. Ochiai and Satoh (1996), in comparing the difference between boys and girls in friendship, found that girls try to understand each other more than do boys, even if they might be hurt by their friends. Compared with girls, boys typically have only a few friends with whom they can discuss everything.…”
Section: Factor Analysis Of the Loneliness Scalementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Friendship Scale The authors listed 30 items considered to be related to friendship in early adolescence. Thirty friendship items were selected by referring to the previously established friendship scale (Ochiai & Sato, 1996), and modifying these items to fit the friendship of early adolescence. A 4-point scale was used for ratings, with anchors of not at all (1) to very strongly (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This factor showed the breadth of the attitudes in their friendship. Two factors which were extracted in this study almost corresponded with the studies of Ochiai & Sato (1996) and Oshio (1998). By the second factor analysis of friendship in adolescence, the types of friendship were grouped into four (broad-deep friendship, narrow-deep friendship, broad-shallow friendship and narrow-shallow friendship).…”
Section: Second Factor Analysis Of Friendship Scalementioning
confidence: 99%