2020
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1816171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic methods in the COVID-19 pandemic, today and in the future

Abstract: Introduction: The emergence of anovel coronavirus identified in patients with unknown cause of acute respiratory disease in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019 has caused aglobal outbreak. The causative coronavirus was later named as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 was named as Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). As of 10 August 2020, more than 19,718,030 confirmed cases and 728,013 deaths have been reported. COVID-19 is spread via respiratory drop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding was 17.0 days (95% CI 15.5-18.6; 43 studies, 3,229 individuals) in the upper respiratory tract, 14.6 days (95% CI 9.3-20.0; seven studies, 260 individuals) in lower respiratory tract, and 17.2 days (95% CI 14.4-20.1; 13 studies, 586 individuals) in stool (103). An earlier study highlighted two COVID-19 cases with positive stool before pharyngeal specimens (102), suggesting that stool may be an alternative to respiratory specimens for early virus discovery in individuals unable to provide respiratory samples, such as infants (104). Stool as a source is consistent with the virus being found in wastewater, where it is presumed to survive several days.…”
Section: Specimens For Molecular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding was 17.0 days (95% CI 15.5-18.6; 43 studies, 3,229 individuals) in the upper respiratory tract, 14.6 days (95% CI 9.3-20.0; seven studies, 260 individuals) in lower respiratory tract, and 17.2 days (95% CI 14.4-20.1; 13 studies, 586 individuals) in stool (103). An earlier study highlighted two COVID-19 cases with positive stool before pharyngeal specimens (102), suggesting that stool may be an alternative to respiratory specimens for early virus discovery in individuals unable to provide respiratory samples, such as infants (104). Stool as a source is consistent with the virus being found in wastewater, where it is presumed to survive several days.…”
Section: Specimens For Molecular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different institutions rely on varying numbers of SARS-CoV-2 gene targets and different target regions. Gene targets include structural proteins, which have higher sensitivity for coronavirus detection, and species-specific SARS-CoV-2 accessory genes (104). Use of multiple PCR targets helps to avoid falsenegatives associated with mutations in the primer site, especially mismatches at the 3' end (117,118).…”
Section: Technical Aspects Of Molecular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several current endeavors to develop less expensive, faster, and dependable diagnostic tools based on specific SARS-CoV-2 antigens detection to be used as rapid diagnostic tests [188]. This approach intended to directly reveal, in respiratory secretions, the highly expressed viral antigens during virus replication [188][189][190], has a suboptimal sensitivity and requires adequate concentration of antigens. Therefore, the antigen assays could potentially be employed as a triage test to quickly highlight the patients susceptible to have COVID-19 infection [189].…”
Section: Antigen Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with antibody testing, the principle of antigen detection relies on the mobilization of the sample along the test strip by capillary action [190]. These assays are not limited to a particular format as the target antigen can be captured by fluorescent-labeled or colloidal gold antibodies.…”
Section: Antigen Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though RTPCR has been the mainstay of covid diagnosis, the importance of serological diagnostic procedures cannot be underestimated. Combining RTPCR with serological assays increases the sensitivity of diagnosing Covid19 many fold [6] which can be helpful in setting various protocols. Whereas RTPCR detects the viral genome in patients sample and clearly tells about the presence or absence of disease, serological detection of IgG, IgM or IgA tells about past or present infection and immune status of patient against Covid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%