2020
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential impact of COVID‐19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown

Abstract: That the COVID‐19 pandemic has affected the work conditions of large segments of the society is in no doubt. A growing body of journalistic accounts raised the possibility that the lockdown caused by the pandemic affects women and men in different ways, due mostly to the traditionally gendered division of labor in the society. We attempt to test this oft‐cited argument by conducting an original survey with nearly 200 academics. Specifically, we explore the extent to which the effect of the lockdown on child‐ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
197
2
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
197
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current dataset (1 January 2019 to 1 October 2020), 82.0% of papers were submitted by the first author (averaged across journals). If time availability has been more greatly affected by the pandemic for women than for men (as suggested by survey data; Collins et al, 2020;Myers et al, 2020;Yildirim & Eslen-Ziya, 2020), we might observe that, although women continued to be authors of their research manuscripts, they are more likely to defer the submission process to their co-authors during the pandemic. However, there is no evidence that the proportion of either male or female first authors that serve as submitting author has declined during the pandemic (comparing pre-March 15 with post-March 15 in 2020; male: X 2 1 = 2.05, p = 0.15; female: X 2 1 = 0.03, p = 0.86), nor do we see any evidence that the proportion of men or women serving as submitting author declined from 2019 to 2020 (comparing 15 March 2019 to 1 October 2019 with the same period in 2020; male: X 2 1 = 3.83, p = 0.051; female: X 2 1 = 0.22, p = 0.64).…”
Section: The Representation Of Women Among Authorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current dataset (1 January 2019 to 1 October 2020), 82.0% of papers were submitted by the first author (averaged across journals). If time availability has been more greatly affected by the pandemic for women than for men (as suggested by survey data; Collins et al, 2020;Myers et al, 2020;Yildirim & Eslen-Ziya, 2020), we might observe that, although women continued to be authors of their research manuscripts, they are more likely to defer the submission process to their co-authors during the pandemic. However, there is no evidence that the proportion of either male or female first authors that serve as submitting author has declined during the pandemic (comparing pre-March 15 with post-March 15 in 2020; male: X 2 1 = 2.05, p = 0.15; female: X 2 1 = 0.03, p = 0.86), nor do we see any evidence that the proportion of men or women serving as submitting author declined from 2019 to 2020 (comparing 15 March 2019 to 1 October 2019 with the same period in 2020; male: X 2 1 = 3.83, p = 0.051; female: X 2 1 = 0.22, p = 0.64).…”
Section: The Representation Of Women Among Authorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most importantly, these institutions need to support early career researchers—our students and recent graduates—whose careers are most vulnerable to extended disruptions to their research and the resulting reduced scholarly productivity. Vincent‐Lamarre et al (2020) provide a list of suggestions for how best to support our vulnerable colleagues, many of which, we are pleased to see, have been adopted by leading universities.…”
Section: Has the Pandemic Had Disproportionate Impacts On Female Authmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that this might, at least in part, be due to an exacerbation of pre-existing work–family conflicts, especially for early-career mothers in academia. 12 With lockdown measures to prevent uncontrolled spread of the coronavirus came not only remote working, but also closures of childcare services like daycares and schools transferring teaching responsibilities often to mothers, without the possibility to involve family members in childcare that belong to the ageing population who are particularly vulnerable to severe illness from the coronavirus. 12–16 Evidence from Germany showed, for example, that women not only took over the physical load of increased childcare and household responsibilities, but also the mental load associated with taking care of the family during a pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 With lockdown measures to prevent uncontrolled spread of the coronavirus came not only remote working, but also closures of childcare services like daycares and schools transferring teaching responsibilities often to mothers, without the possibility to involve family members in childcare that belong to the ageing population who are particularly vulnerable to severe illness from the coronavirus. 12–16 Evidence from Germany showed, for example, that women not only took over the physical load of increased childcare and household responsibilities, but also the mental load associated with taking care of the family during a pandemic. 17 Even prior to the pandemic, research has shown that childrearing and household work were tasks largely taken care of by women, thereby impacting women’s academic careers more than men’s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%