1942
DOI: 10.1021/j150417a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diffusion Coefficient of Cupric Sulfate from 0.0 to 0.35 Molar at 25°C.

Abstract: 1. The 25°C. isotherm for the system lithium chloride-dioxane-water has been presented. The system shows immiscibility for mixtures of high dioxane content.2. A new solvate, LiCl • H20 • (CMD/L, has been prepared and identified.3. A method of preparing anhydrous lithium chloride from the double solvate has been described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These functions are further discussed in Appendix I. properties 0 and t+ (Eversole et al, 1942, Fritz et al, 1958, corresponding to the bulk electrolyte concentration Cb = 0.1 M Cuso 4 were employed in the evaluation of eq. 26, which should be a good approximation because concentration changes for short times are small.…”
Section: (4) Computation Of Steady-state Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These functions are further discussed in Appendix I. properties 0 and t+ (Eversole et al, 1942, Fritz et al, 1958, corresponding to the bulk electrolyte concentration Cb = 0.1 M Cuso 4 were employed in the evaluation of eq. 26, which should be a good approximation because concentration changes for short times are small.…”
Section: (4) Computation Of Steady-state Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the range of concentrations of interest, the variation in physical properties should be accounted for. Between 0 and 0.1 M CuS04 the electrolyte diffusion coefficient D shows a 40% variation (Eversole et al, 1942), and the cation transference number t+ exhibits a 10% variation (Fritz et al, 1958). There is also a possible ±10% uncertainty in the value of the electrolyte diffusion coefficient at a given concentration.…”
Section: C-csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cuprous ion is thermodynamically unstable and disproportionates to Cu 0 and Cu 2+ in most aqueous electrolytes, thus making the cuprous systems more difficult to study. However, the addition of high concentrations of halide ions and the absence of oxygen stabilize the copper­(I) oxidation state. The diffusion coefficient of Cu 2+ in sulfate electrolytes has been widely studied. However, relatively few papers have been published on diffusion in the copper chloride electrolyte, , and much of that work is only of the cupric , chloride species and less of the cuprous , chloride species. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the cuprous/cupric bromide system has not been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior papers for theory [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and experiments [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] on concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient in electrochemistry have been published. In general, the diffusion coefficient may be a function of concentration of the diffusing species, or a function of the positional coordinates [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the diffusion coefficient may be a function of concentration of the diffusing species, or a function of the positional coordinates [16]. For instance, the diffusion coefficient depends on concentration when metals and non-metals diffuse into a metals [15], salts diffuse in solution [14], or with the diffusion of linear polymers [7,17]. Most of experiments concerning the intercalation process show that it obeys a diffusion control with a diffusion coefficient depending on the concentration [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%