2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dilemma of government intervention in a firm's financing: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…China’s financial system is underdeveloped [ 29 ]. It comprises the banking and intermediation sector, financial markets, shadow financial sector, and foreign sectors [ 30 ].…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China’s financial system is underdeveloped [ 29 ]. It comprises the banking and intermediation sector, financial markets, shadow financial sector, and foreign sectors [ 30 ].…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, enterprises supplement capital shortage by applying for government financial support (Adom and Adams 2020) and bank loans (Biswas and Koufopoulos 2019). However, according to Forrester and Reames, even if enterprises apply for government funding or bank loans, their operating costs remain high and their financing efficiencies are not significantly improved (Fu 2020).…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we cannot use the statistical measure to test the validity of IV. As an alternative method, we try to test the direct effect of our IV on inno according to the mediation method (Sobel, 1982; Feng et al, 2019;Fu, 2020;Fu & Jian, 2021; Fu, 2021). innoitgoodbreak=α0goodbreak+α1lninstuitgoodbreak+β1italicIVgoodbreak+αjXjitgoodbreak+vigoodbreak+utgoodbreak+εit If the coefficient on IV is significant in Equation , the imperfect exogeneity assumption of IV is violated; otherwise, our IV estimates are robust to the imperfect exogeneity (Conley et al, 2012; Nunn & Wantchekon, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%