The Dilemma of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia

Abstract

The final and binding nature of international arbitral awards results in the nullification of the rights of the parties to file legal remedies against the arbitral award, as is the case with decisions of national courts that can be appealed, appealed, or reviewed. However, Article 68 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an opportunity for parties who refuse to recognize and implement an international arbitral award that can be appealed to, as well as Article 70 must also be explained that Article this applies only to national arbitrations. This of course creates legal uncertainty, disuse, and injustice for the parties. Therefore, what is highlighted in this research is what is the position of the final and binding international arbitration award in Indonesia. The research method used in this article is legal research using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research show that the position of international arbitral awards in Indonesia is not the same as the decisions of national courts because they cannot be appealed, cassated, and reviewed. Therefore, it is necessary to completely amend international arbitration arrangements by removing Article 68 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in order to provide legal certainty, benefit, and justice for the parties.

Issues Concerning the Validity of Agreements Excluding Rescission Procedures in International Commercial Arbitration

“…In the Tabbane v. Switzerland case, the European Court of Human Rights grappled with an arbitration agreement in a commercial setting, raising questions about the equilibrium between party autonomy in arbitration and the right to a fair trial as protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).National laws governing arbitration agreements can sometimes clash with the protections enshrined in the ECHR. The ECtHR's role is to ensure that states adhere to the ECHR, and if an exclusion agreement undermines fundamental rights, the ECtHR may intervene [7] (The crux of the conflict often lies in balancing the autonomy of parties to choose arbitration against the imperative to protect individual rights. The Tabbane case exemplifies the challenge of maintaining this equilibrium, particularly when exclusion agreements may potentially limit access to justice or violate other human rights principles [8] .…”

Stimulus Variation Strategies and Audiovisual Media for Indonesian for Foreign Speakers Students (Strategi Variasi Stimulus dan Media Audiovisual bagi Pemelajar Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing)

“…This factor causes Indonesia to become one of the most popular tourist and cultural destinations in the world. In addition, Indonesia's participation and contribution in international relations (Dzikri, 2020;Emmers, 2014;Prabowo & Sinaga, 2020;Puspita et al, 2023;Saputro & Anggrasari, 2021;Thontowi & Wati, 2023) which is manifested in bilateral relations with several friendly countries in various fields opens up great opportunities for the Indonesian people to interact with the ideology, culture, and language of foreign nations. This indirectly also has an impact on the existence of Indonesian as an international language for various purposes such as tourism, education, culture, economy and so on.…”

Relevansi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Pemberlakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia

“…Frasa "di luar pengadilan" atau out of court settlement menunjukkan satu lembaga atau institusi di luar pengadilan yang menyelesaikan sengketa (Fuady, 2003). Putusan arbitrase internasional tersebut menyangkut permasalahan hukum yang timbul dalam ruang lingkup perdagangan internasional, adapun kegiatannya meliputi; perniagaan, perbankan, keuangan, penanaman modal, industri, dan hak kekayaan intelektual (Bianti, 2023) (Puspita et al, 2023).…”