1994
DOI: 10.1002/gea.3340090403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diring paleolithic site, Eastern Siberia: Review of geoarchaeological studies

Abstract: Geoarchaeological studies using geomorphological, lithological, cryolithological, palynological, paleomagnetic, thermoluminescent, and plant macrofossil analyses have been conducted on the Diring site, eastern Siberia. Mochanov (1988a, 1988b) assumed that the sediments which overlay the Diring cultural layer are synchronous with the Tabaga terrace of the Lena River (Upper Pliocene) and dated the cultural layer 1.8–3.2 My ago. Alekseev et al. (1990b) concluded that the cultural layer could not have dated earlie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…posed by Mochanov (1992Mochanov ( , 1993 and Waters et al (1997), contradicts the lithic and biostratigraphic data (Kamaletdinov and Zigert, 1989: Figure 5; Kuzmin and Krivonogov, 1994). An argument supporting the claim for the much younger age of the cultural layer is shown in the fact that artifact distribution in the lower part of the paleoslope, within the colluvial deposits, is little disturbed, even though the cultural layer is almost exposed on the surface in the lowermost part of the excavations (Figure 2, area encircled).…”
Section: Problems With the General Stratigraphy At Diringmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…posed by Mochanov (1992Mochanov ( , 1993 and Waters et al (1997), contradicts the lithic and biostratigraphic data (Kamaletdinov and Zigert, 1989: Figure 5; Kuzmin and Krivonogov, 1994). An argument supporting the claim for the much younger age of the cultural layer is shown in the fact that artifact distribution in the lower part of the paleoslope, within the colluvial deposits, is little disturbed, even though the cultural layer is almost exposed on the surface in the lowermost part of the excavations (Figure 2, area encircled).…”
Section: Problems With the General Stratigraphy At Diringmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, the cultural stratum in the lower excavations may be much younger than the 267,000 years reported by Waters et al (1997). The cultural layer may date to the Late Pleistocene (Kuzmin and Krivonogov, 1994:299) (i.e., anywhere within the Upper Pleistocene [Kuzmin and Krivonogov 1994]), from 10,000 to 125,000 years ago (Velichko, 1984). This is not simply "no more than 15,000 years old," as was understood by Waters et al (1997Waters et al ( :1281.…”
Section: Problems With the General Stratigraphy At Diringmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diring-Yuriakh, a Lower Paleolithic lithic quarry locality (61° N, 128° E) located on the highest (Tabaginsk) terrace of the Lena River in Yakutia, raised debates about geoarchaeological uncertainties and age (Arkhipov, 1999: 139;The Paleolithic…, 1998: 336-337;Kuzmin, 2000: 33-35;Kuzmin, Krivonogov, 1994, 1999 despite its intrinsic interest (Derevianko, 1990: 9-11). The setting, plan, stratification, abundant artifacts, and refittings (Mochanov, 1988a, b;Mochanov, Fedoseyeva, 2002: Fig.…”
Section: Lower Paleolithic Dispersals In Northern Eurasiamentioning
confidence: 98%