2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The disciplinary effect of subordinated debt on bank risk taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Nguyen (2013) analyzed the disciplinary effect of issuing subordinated debt on the undesirable forms of risk-taking in the period 2002 -2008. The author obtained evidence that the issuing of subordinated debt had an attenuating effect on the risk-taking of banks owing to the effects of discipline on the market.…”
Section: Positive or Negative Factors Regarding The Issuance Of Idecs From The Standpoint Of The Shareholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Nguyen (2013) analyzed the disciplinary effect of issuing subordinated debt on the undesirable forms of risk-taking in the period 2002 -2008. The author obtained evidence that the issuing of subordinated debt had an attenuating effect on the risk-taking of banks owing to the effects of discipline on the market.…”
Section: Positive or Negative Factors Regarding The Issuance Of Idecs From The Standpoint Of The Shareholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an international sample of banks, Demirguc‐Kunt and Huizinga ( ) find evidence of an implicit guarantee for large banks (the so‐called TBTF effect) in the senior CDS market. In addition, Nguyen ( ) demonstrates that subordinated debt is the best choice for providing increased market discipline because of its junior status, whereas other uninsured debt (including senior unsecured debt) does not appear to be as effective. Furthermore, based on comprehensive data on the Canadian banking sector, Beyhaghi et al ( ) also support the TBTF argument in the senior unsecured debt sector and argue that market discipline exists for subordinated debt but not for senior debt.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an international sample of banks, Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga (2013) find evidence of an implicit guarantee for large banks (the so called "too-big-to-fail" effect) in the senior CDS market. In addition, Nguyen (2013) demonstrates that subordinated debt is the best choice for providing increased market discipline due to its junior status, while other uninsured debt (including senior unsecured debt) does not appear to be as effective. 6 The conclusion that yields of subordinated debt were insensitive to banks' riskiness in the early 1980s may not at all indicate the presence of implicit guarantees, which blinded investors' eyes.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%