The discovery of quarks

Abstract

In the period following World War II, there was a rapid development of particle physics. With the construction of synchrotrons and the development of detector technology, many new particles were discovered and the systematics of their interactions investigated. The invention of the bubble chamber played an especially important role in uncovering the rich array of hadrons that were discovered in this period. In 1961 Murray Gell‐Mann [1] and Yuval Ne'eman [2] independently introduced a classification scheme, based on SU(3) symmetry, which placed hadrons into families on the basis of spin and parity. Like the periodic table for the elements, this scheme was predictive as well as descriptive, and various hadrons, such as the Ω—, were predicted within this framework and were later discovered. In 1964 Gell‐Mann [3] and George Zweig [4] independently proposed quarks as the building blocks of hadrons as a way of generating the SU(3) classification scheme. When the quark model was first proposed, it postulated three types of quarks: up (u), down (d), and strange (s), with charges 2/3, —1/3, and —1/3 respectively. Each of these was hypothesized to be a spin1/2 particle. In this model the nucleon (and all other baryons) is made up of three quarks, and each meson consists of a quark and an antiquark. For example, as the proton and neutron both have ero strangeness, they are (u,u,d) and (d,d,u) systems respectively. Though the quark model provided the best available tool for understanding the properties of the hadrons that had been discovered at the time, the model was thought by many to be merely a mathematical representation of some deeper dynamics, but one of heuristic value. Among the reasons for this assessment were the following:free quarks had not been found though they had been sought in numerous accelerator and cosmic ray investigations and in searches in the terrestrial environment; there was a deep suspicion about the validity of their fractional charge assignments; and some of the baryon states constructed on the basis of the quark model violated the Pauli exclusion principle. Despite these difficulties there were a small number of theorists who continued to apply the model to explain a wide range of hadronic phenomena. The theory of hadron structure that was most widely accepted at the time was the bootstrap model, an approach based on S‐Matrix theory. This model, sometimes referred to as “nuclear democracy,” was based on the idea that there were no fundamental particles and that all hadrons are made up of one another. This picture was consistent with the low momentum transfer scattering seen in hadron‐hadron interactions and with the observed “soft” electromagnetic form factors of the proton and neutron; however, it could not provide the comprehensive description of multiplet structures that was given by the quark model. Inelastic electron‐nucleon scattering results, and later those from neutrino‐scattering, played a pivotal role in resolving this dilemma by firmly establishing the quark model. These ex...

Dyson norms in XUV and strong-field ionization of polyatomics: Cytosine and uracil

“…where |φ k m (x n ) is a continuum state with momentum k, and A is the appropriate antisymmetrizer [14]. At this stage, the continuum function |φ k m (x n ) could be either a plane wave or a distorted wave that takes effects of the ionic core on the continuum into account.…”

“…Eqs. (14) and (15) show that the Dyson norms G D lm again appear in the 1 st order expression for the transition probability, and one could still expect that the G D lm could act as rough predictors of the relative ionization probability to the available ionic states, with the assumption that the matrix elements | φ k l | ǫ F · r n |φ D lm | 2 are slowly-varying and carry little structure.…”

Measurement of single-target spin asymmetries in the electroproduction of negative pions in the semi-inclusive deep inelastic reaction n^↑(e,e'π^-)X on a transversely polarized ³He target

“…The variable x is a dimentionless quantity which is defined as x = Q 2 2.M.ν where M is the mass of the target nucleon, ν is the energy loss between the incoming and the scattered electrons and Q 2 is the four momentum 2 The invariant mass of a particle or a system of particles is a mathematical combination of the total energy and momentum of the particle or the system of particles which is independent of the inertial frame of reference. If the system is at rest, the invariant mass is the total energy of the system divided by c 2 where c is the velocity of light.…”

“…The flipping of the spins was done by sending an RF signal to the target (NMR discussed in chapter 4). 2 The number of events detected after applying all the detector PID and kinematic cuts was corrected for the charge and livetime.…”

“…Prior to the elementary quark model describing the formation of the hadrons from the quarks, Gell-Mann [29] and Yuval Ne'eman [30] introduced a classification scheme based on SU(3) symmetry, which placed the hadrons into families on the basis of 1 spin and parity. The quark model was a way to generate this classification scheme [2].…”