The Discriminant Accuracy of a Grammatical Measure With Latino English-Speaking Children

Abstract

Purpose-To evaluate the discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure for the identification of language impairment (LI) in Latino English-speaking children. Specifically, the study examined the diagnostic accuracy of the Test of English Morphosyntax (E-MST; Peña, Gutiérrez-Clellen, Iglesias, Goldstein, & Bedore (n.d.) to determine (a) whether use and exposure to Spanish had an effect on the performance of bilingual children compared with monolingual Latino children and (b) whether dialectal differences within Latino English speakers might result in performance differences and a greater incidence of misclassifications for children from Caribbean English backgrounds.Method-One hundred and eleven children (i.e., 59 children with typical language development and 52 children with LI) were sampled from the Southwest and Northeast regions of the U.S. Southwestern children were of Mexican origin. Children from the Northeast were from Puerto Rican or Dominican backgrounds. Linear discriminant analyses evaluating group classifications on the basis of the E-MST were performed on exploratory and confirmatory data sets across 3 groups: Southwestern English-only proficient (SW EP) children, Southwestern English-dominant bilingual (SW EDB) children, and Northeastern (NE) children.Results-Results of the exploratory discriminant analyses indicated good sensitivity for the SW EP children. The discriminant functions derived from the exploratory analysis were able to predict group membership in confirmatory discriminant analyses with fair sensitivity and good specificity for the SW EDB children and with fair sensitivity but poor specificity for the NE children. Children who were English-dominant bilingual were not more likely to be misclassified compared with their English-only proficient peers. However, nonmainstream English dialect differences appeared to affect classification accuracy and resulted in a greater number of misclassifications for the NE children with typical language development. Conclusion-The measure seems to be suitable for identifying LI in SW children who are exposed to Spanish and/or who are English-dominant bilingual. Additional assessment tools will be needed to rule out the disorder in children who are exposed to African American or Caribbean English dialects. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptResearch with mainstream English-speaking children has helped advance our understanding of the grammatical characteristics of specific language impairment (SLI) and the potential predictive value of grammatical measures in clinical assessments (for a detailed review, see Leonard, 1998). However, accurate identification of SLI in children from nonmainstream backgrounds may be difficult because these children may score lower than the norms on standardized language tests in spite of having typical language development (TLD; Norris, Juarez, & Perkins, 1989;Peña, Quinn, & Iglesias, 1992; Qi, 2005;Qi, Kaiser, Milan, Yzquierdo, & Hancock, 2003;Restrepo et al., 2006;Washingto...

English past tense use as a clinical marker in older bilingual children with language impairment

“…Some test developers suggest that test takers who are English L2 learners should not be penalized for bare stem errors on regular or irregular past tense verbs, as these may reflect dialectal differences (Semel et al, 2006). Similarly, dialectal features may be responsible for weakening the sensitivity of newer test batteries developed to identify LI in English-dominant Latino children residing in the Northeastern US, even though this same instrument shows good sensitivity and specificity for Latino children in other parts of the country (Gutierrez-Clellen and Simon-Cereijido, 2007). Clinically, this poses a problem.…”

Identification of Specific Language Impairment in Bilingual Children: I. Assessment in English

“…In the area of grammatical morphology, Spanish-English and French-English bilinguals have demonstrated English error patterns that were similar to those of monolingual English speakers (Gutiérrez-Clellen & Simón-Cereijido, 2007). In a follow-up study, Gutiérrez-Clellen, Simón-Cereijido, and Wagner (2008) compared bilingual Spanish-English speakers and monolingual English speakers with and without SLI on measures of verb marking and subject use.…”

The disfluent speech of a Spanish–English bilingual child who stutters

“…Additionally, no past or present parent, teacher, or prior SLP concerns were noted regarding her language. Other researchers have validated the use of the BESA morphosyntax subtests and report the syntax subtests as having good to excellent discriminant classification (Gutiérrez-Clellen & Simón-Cereijido, 2007). Preliminary analysis of the Spanish semantics test data with a group of 284, 4-6 year-old children indicates co-efficient alpha between 0.78 and 0.84.…”