2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distal Biceps Tendon: Footprint and Relevant Clinical Anatomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
147
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
147
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Dirim et al [6] and at variance with the description given by Athwal et al [1] and Eames et al [7]. It was observed that there was considerable contribution from the short head to the proximal part of BA and in many instances it was in the form of strong musculotendinous fibres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with Dirim et al [6] and at variance with the description given by Athwal et al [1] and Eames et al [7]. It was observed that there was considerable contribution from the short head to the proximal part of BA and in many instances it was in the form of strong musculotendinous fibres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Further, they have stated that the short and long head offer varying contribution not only to the distal tendon of biceps brachii but also to the BA [6]. Athwal et al [1] reported that the BA originated from the distal part of short head of the biceps in all 15 specimens studied; whereas, Eames et al [7] stated major role of long head in the formation of BA. Dirim et al [6] have reported that the BA is formed by superficial tendinous fibres arising from both muscle bellies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study suggest that most distal biceps brachii tendons have multiple connections between the tendinous bands that originate from each muscle belly. Suggestion that the two heads independently serve the dual function of the muscle (flexion and supination) (Athwal et al, 2007;Eames et al, 2007) cannot be supported by these data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%