2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of Mycobacterium bovis infection in naturally infected badgers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
76
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential route if badgers and cattle come into close proximity is inhalation of aerosolised droplets; however, infected badgers are also known to shed M. bovis in their urine and faeces [9, 10], which may contaminate the environment. Badgers habitually defecate in clusters of shallow pits known as latrines which if accessible to cattle may act as a possible source of infection [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A potential route if badgers and cattle come into close proximity is inhalation of aerosolised droplets; however, infected badgers are also known to shed M. bovis in their urine and faeces [9, 10], which may contaminate the environment. Badgers habitually defecate in clusters of shallow pits known as latrines which if accessible to cattle may act as a possible source of infection [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is known that some infected badgers excrete M. bovis in their faeces [9, 10], we proposed the development of an immunochromatographic lateral flow device (LFD) and its use in combination with an existing immunomagnetic separation (IMS) technique [21, 22] as a non-invasive test for the presence of M. bovis . Immunochromatographic assays are easy to use, cheap to produce, and provide a rapid result (within 15 min), so are ideal for field use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is unlikely that culture is a perfect ‘gold standard’, the methodology used in this study is based on an enhanced post mortem technique, currently the most sensitive available. In recent years, a progressive increase in estimated prevalence of M. bovis infection in badgers has been observed, both in Ireland and the UK, attributable to improved sensitivity of detection [3], [4]. Crawshaw et al (2008) [28] reported a 54% sensitivity of a standard post-mortem procedure compared to a more detailed enhanced post mortem technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers, based on animals captured as part of culling operations by the national Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), was estimated recently at 36.3% [3], although this is known to vary substantially between areas where bTB in cattle is problematic [4] or absent [5]. Sustainable progress towards eradication of M. bovis infection in cattle might not be possible in the face of continued spillover of infection from badgers to cattle [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shedding of M . bovis has already been demonstrated in many species via oro-nasal mucus, sputum, urine, feces and wound discharges, depending on the species [7, 10, 11]. Previous experimental studies using various environmental substrates showed that M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%