2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diverging roles of dendritic cells in kidney allotransplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After lymph node homing, mature DCs present antigens to T cells causing their differentiation toward Th1 and Th17 effector cells, which can contribute to graft failure. There are also reports indicating that resident DCs confer protective responses to limit I/R injury and damage induced by allotransplantation (420a, 639a). Although the non-stressed brain lacks DCs or functional counterparts that mediate antigen uptake and presentation, these cells do appear in brain parenchyma within 1 hr after induction of ischemia, where they act to exacerbate stroke-induced infarction (235a).…”
Section: Cell Types Involved In Postischemic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After lymph node homing, mature DCs present antigens to T cells causing their differentiation toward Th1 and Th17 effector cells, which can contribute to graft failure. There are also reports indicating that resident DCs confer protective responses to limit I/R injury and damage induced by allotransplantation (420a, 639a). Although the non-stressed brain lacks DCs or functional counterparts that mediate antigen uptake and presentation, these cells do appear in brain parenchyma within 1 hr after induction of ischemia, where they act to exacerbate stroke-induced infarction (235a).…”
Section: Cell Types Involved In Postischemic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, T cells can also be activated by antigen-independent pathways by cytokines, ROS and other pro-inflammatory molecules such as TNFα and CGRP that are formed during I/R, as outlined above. In the setting of transplantation-induced I/R, danger signals released from dying cells are recognized by PRRs of the innate immune system with subsequent activation of inflammatory cells, including DCs, which are directed to a more mature phenotype (379a, 639a). After lymph node homing, mature DCs present antigens to T cells causing their differentiation toward Th1 and Th17 effector cells, which can contribute to graft failure.…”
Section: Cell Types Involved In Postischemic Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to allorecognition upon solid organ transplantation, the danger hypothesis was first mentioned in the early 2000s (335-337, 340, 341, 351). A growing body of literature suggests that allograft injury results in DAMP release (2,116,124,148,159,247,343,345,384,460,499,513,652,692,729). This may be of particular importance for the "canonical" (oxidative) injury that has been demonstrated to be inevitably associated with donor brain death and during ischemia-reperfusion injury.…”
Section: Role Of Damps In Human Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of organ transplantation, the danger/injury model was tackled for the first time in the early 2000s and, more recently, comprehensively addressed in a monograph . According to currently accepted models , any injury to an allograft, in particular, the “canonical” oxidative injury as occurring in the donor under brain death condition and in the recipient during postischemic reperfusion, leads to induction of various classes of DAMPs that activate intragraft PRR‐bearing cells of the donor's and recipient's innate immune system, a process that results in inflammation of the allograft. In parallel, donor‐derived and recipient‐derived dendritic cells (DCs), activated after uptake of alloantigens and recognition of various DAMPs by their corresponding PRRs, elicit—via the process of direct and indirect allorecognition—a robust adaptive anti‐donor alloimmune response ultimately resulting in allograft rejection .…”
Section: The Danger/injury Model In Immunologymentioning
confidence: 99%