2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Donald” and the market: Is there a cointegration?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results imply that electioneering activities impacted negatively on GSE returns both in the short-run and long-run. This confirms that electioneering activities affect GSE market performance, and it tallies with the studies by Angelini et al (2018), Dӧpke and Pierdzioch (2006) and Günay (2016). The GSE's poor performance can affect the political parties in power negatively and create an arbitrage opportunity for speculators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results imply that electioneering activities impacted negatively on GSE returns both in the short-run and long-run. This confirms that electioneering activities affect GSE market performance, and it tallies with the studies by Angelini et al (2018), Dӧpke and Pierdzioch (2006) and Günay (2016). The GSE's poor performance can affect the political parties in power negatively and create an arbitrage opportunity for speculators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound test approach to cointegration and Granger causality test were used to examine the daily data. The result shows that electioneering activity negatively affects the GSE returns both in the short-run and long-run, and the results correlate with work of Angelini et al (2018), Dӧpke and Pierdzioch (2006) and Günay (2016). The abysmal performance of the GSE market may send the political party in power into opposition and does create arbitrage opportunities for speculators (disproving the arbitrage pricing model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%