1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The double isotope tracer method is a reliable measure of fractional zinc absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FA results from all three samples agreed well with the expected absorbance value. King et al (43) concluded that "... the double isotope tracer method is a more accurate measure of zinc FA than is the fecal monitoring method ..."…”
Section: Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FA results from all three samples agreed well with the expected absorbance value. King et al (43) concluded that "... the double isotope tracer method is a more accurate measure of zinc FA than is the fecal monitoring method ..."…”
Section: Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friel et al (3) found "good agreement" between the two methods, but Rautscher and Fairweather-Tait (8) concluded that DITR does "not reliably predict" FZA. On the basis of a number of experimental and simulation considerations, we believe that the fecal monitoring method is an inappropriate reference for assessing DITR (5,9). In addition, we believe that the latter method does provide a valid estimate of FZA (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%