SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-0252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Driveability Test Facility Wind Tunnel No. 8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. While airline details are always different, the overall philosophy employed in the design of the airline components is the same as in other efforts [1,2,3,4,5]. Fundamentally, the approach is to minimize the circuit footprint (capital cost) while taking extreme care not to create flow separations and other instabilities throughout the circuit, which can then be only partially cleaned up in the flow conditioning section at the cost of increased fan power and circuit length.…”
Section: Airlinementioning
confidence: 98%
“…1. While airline details are always different, the overall philosophy employed in the design of the airline components is the same as in other efforts [1,2,3,4,5]. Fundamentally, the approach is to minimize the circuit footprint (capital cost) while taking extreme care not to create flow separations and other instabilities throughout the circuit, which can then be only partially cleaned up in the flow conditioning section at the cost of increased fan power and circuit length.…”
Section: Airlinementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Owing to the recirculation of the air in the tunnel, the temperature in the tunnel can rise significantly during a long testing session and this can affect clay models and also aeroacoustic measurements, for example by affecting the compliance of the door seals. Therefore, some tunnels incorporate a heat exchanger to control the tunnel conditions, for instance Walter et al (2002). The advantages of an open-return tunnel are the converse of the closed tunnel's disadvantages.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audi, Wickern and Lindener (2000); BMW, von Heesen et al (1996); Chrysler, Walter et al (2003); DNW, Mercker and Pengel (1994); Ford (Europe), Volkert and Kohl (1987); Ford (US), Walter et al (2002); GIE S2A, Waudby-Smith et al (2004); Hyundai, Kim et al (2001); IVK/FKFS, Potthof et al (1994), Künstner et al (1995); Pininfarina, Cogotti (2006) Wall treatment is used to achieve two objectives. The first is to provide an anechoic environment within the test section, to create a close-to free-field environment by reducing the reverberation and reflection of sound waves from the noise sources of the vehicle.…”
Section: Aeroacousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific examples of these phenomena, shown in Especially, fluctuations induced by the acoustic resonances of the whole circuit are generally called acoustic resonance components or tunnel mode components (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). These are related to the wind speed and often increase to become serious problems such as pulsations at particular wind speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%