2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
408
2
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(445 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
23
408
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This dimension also largely determines the strategic decision making and survival of the organization (Miller & Friesen, ). The results obtained for the economic and financial returns would confirm what was indicated by Cai and Li (). They established that the processes of ecoinnovation and ecodesign imply high costs and business risks that may hinder a company from obtaining economic benefits in the short term.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This dimension also largely determines the strategic decision making and survival of the organization (Miller & Friesen, ). The results obtained for the economic and financial returns would confirm what was indicated by Cai and Li (). They established that the processes of ecoinnovation and ecodesign imply high costs and business risks that may hinder a company from obtaining economic benefits in the short term.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results confirm that the Hypotheses H1 and H2 are established in this work. In this regard, we show that investments in ecoinnovation and ecodesign have a negative impact on business results as a result of the high cost of investments in ecoinnovation and ecodesign, and business risks can make it difficult to obtain economic benefits in the short term (Cai & Li, ). On the other hand, without adequate administrative support, investments in ecoinnovation and ecodesign will not be effective and therefore would not lead to a positive result (Cheng et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The positive effect on green adoption supports the findings of Abdul-Rashid et al (2017) that found similar results in their study on drivers for adoption of sustainable practices in Malaysia. Cai and Li (2018) also found that competitor pressure is a primary influencer of eco-innovation, thus showing consistence between their works and the current study. Again, the findings agrees with the outcome of Aboelmaged (2018) who found that competitive pressure impacts the decision to implement green initiatives in small and medium firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although the companies are becoming more proactive in adopting green initiatives as disclosed in their reports, both did not affect the short-term performance of companies, measured by ROA and ROE. This is consistent with studies carried out by Aguilera-Caracuel and Ortiz-de-Mandojana [25] and Cai and Li [26]. Green initiatives such as investing in wastewater treatment technologies require high costs and risks as it might not bring expected profits to the company.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%