The Dutch planning experience

Valk, Arnold van der

doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00221-3

Cited by 103 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, for several reasons (reviewed by Lambreght & Zonneveld, 2004) it was only the 4 th report on planning, published in 1988 (VROM, 1988), that first explicitly anticipated on market-driven regional development ( Van der Valk, 2002). The belief in fair, distributional principles, the backbone of the original Randstad concept, endured in this report, in the form of the Stedenring Centraal Nederland (Dutch Central City Rim), a version of the Randstad concept that included some urban agglomerations in the east of the Netherlands.…”

Section: Early Regional Design Practices: Outside the National Governmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional design: Discretionary approaches to regional planning in The Netherlands

Balz

2017

Planning Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Early Regional Design Practices: Outside the National Governmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional design: Discretionary approaches to regional planning in The Netherlands

Balz

2017

Planning Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An example of consensusoriented decision-making: Dutch urban planning Consensus-building in the Netherlands is implemented through the 'polder model', which is defined as harmonious patterns of interaction between social partners (Glasbergen, 2002;Needham, 2005;Terhorst and Van der Ven, 1998;Van der Valk, 2002). Interest groups are drawn into the policy-making process on the basis of a covenant between business and government (Tasan-Kok and Korthals Altes, 2012).…”

Section: Planning Is An Instrument For Consensusbuilding Where Plannementioning

confidence: 99%

Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning

Özdemir

Taşan‐Kok

2017

Urban Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citizen disagreement on urban policies and planning decisions is both ubiquitous and fundamental to democracy. Post-political debates debunk the 'consensus approach', which is grounded in Habermasian communication theory, for circumventing disagreement. This article presents a counter argument. Our analysis of the highly institutionalised and consensus-oriented Dutch planning framework shows that this system does not necessarily prevent effective voicing of disagreement. The empirical material demonstrates that consensus is not a pre-defined and static outcome but a dynamic and sensitive process in which urban planning is an instrument. We conclude that planners could facilitate consensus through accommodative roles that address disagreement by taking an adaptive, proactive and more human stance.

show abstract

“…The urban areas expanded by 189 % over the period from 1989 to 2002 [25] and available land became a rare and coveted resource. The landscapes are now expected to fulfil multiple functions, i.e., urbanization, agriculture production, and ecosystem conservation, and this causes conflicts among stakeholders about their planning and management [26].…”

Section: Description Of the Study Area And Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards an uncertainty reduction framework for land-cover change prediction using possibility theory

Ferchichi

Boulila

Farah

2016

Vietnam J Comput Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an approach for reducing uncertainty related to the process of land-cover change (LCC) prediction. LCC prediction models have, almost, two sources of uncertainty which are the uncertainty related to model parameters and the uncertainty related to model structure. These uncertainties have a big impact on decisions of the prediction model. To deal with these problems, the proposed approach is divided into three main steps: (1) an uncertainty propagation step based on possibility theory is used as a tool to evaluate the performance of the model; (2) a sensitivity analysis step based on Hartley-like measure is then used to find the most important sources of uncertainty; and (3) a knowledge base based on machine learning algorithm is built to identify the reduction factors of all uncertainty sources of parameters and to reshape their values to reduce in a significant way the uncertainty about future changes of land cover. In this study, the present and future growths of two case studies were anticipated using multi-temporal Spot-4 and Landsat satellite images. These data are used for the preparation of prediction map of year 2025. The results show that our approach based on possibility theory has a potential for reducing uncertainty in LCC prediction modeling. B Ahlem Ferchichi

show abstract

The Dutch planning experience

Cited by 103 publications

References 3 publications

Regional design: Discretionary approaches to regional planning in The Netherlands

Regional design: Discretionary approaches to regional planning in The Netherlands

Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning

Towards an uncertainty reduction framework for land-cover change prediction using possibility theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About