2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
259
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
259
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Registration of outcome is common and research with PROMs in cancer patients shows that its use enhances patient-clinician communication, patientsatisfaction and eventually quality of care [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Partly due to the lack of capacity or funding for traditional follow-up, long-term follow-up is generally not available for high-volume elective treatments such as cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Registration of outcome is common and research with PROMs in cancer patients shows that its use enhances patient-clinician communication, patientsatisfaction and eventually quality of care [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Partly due to the lack of capacity or funding for traditional follow-up, long-term follow-up is generally not available for high-volume elective treatments such as cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funded by health care companies, it is well-organized, validated and reliable according to (inter-) national guidelines and databases [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, for benign pathology, follow-up after treatment is often not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, considerable experience has been obtained with surgical auditing, leading to case ascertainments of 95%, data completeness of almost 100%, and data accuracy of 95-99% [10]. The main equivalent for these audits is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) [23]; although the reported completeness and accuracy is lower compared to the Dutch audits [24], the absence of universal definitions or scoring systems hampers proper comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A collaboration between the national tumor working groups, research groups, and the NCR has resulted in data sharing initiatives allowing data from the NCR to be merged with other databases, e.g., for surgical audits. In these audits, oncologic surgeons collect data for a nationwide auditing initiative, supervised by the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA) [10]. Participation in these audits is mandatory for each hospital.…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this intention, in many European countries, some special programmes and registers were created, allowing for an ongoing assessment of the situation concerning the treatment of patients with specific cancers. An example to follow might be the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) [5].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%