1980
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(80)85075-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamic contact angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, it is shown that even a very thin microscopic film (p s es = 0.1) strongly decreases 0d even for positive p s es . In complete agreement with 0.001 experimental observations, the dynamic advancing contact angle associated with the flow over a pre-wet solid surface is lower than that obtained for the dry solid surface 14 ' 15 , and, if the static contact angle in both cases is the same 14 , 0d increases not so rapidly in the case of a pre-wet solid surface as it does if the surface is dry. Quantitative comparison with the above-cited experiments is difficult due to the lack of information about some parameters involved in the theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4, it is shown that even a very thin microscopic film (p s es = 0.1) strongly decreases 0d even for positive p s es . In complete agreement with 0.001 experimental observations, the dynamic advancing contact angle associated with the flow over a pre-wet solid surface is lower than that obtained for the dry solid surface 14 ' 15 , and, if the static contact angle in both cases is the same 14 , 0d increases not so rapidly in the case of a pre-wet solid surface as it does if the surface is dry. Quantitative comparison with the above-cited experiments is difficult due to the lack of information about some parameters involved in the theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…3 for a soluble surfactant with Bi = 1. These values of m approximately represent the two ends of the range of experimentally observed values for spreading of pure liquids [6,7]. For fixed equilibrium contact angle, the predicted spreading dynamics are relatively insensitive to the value of m, with a surfactant-retarded spreading regime followed by surfactantenhanced spreading in both cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…(2) which is a constitutive equation relating the contact line velocity to the dynamic contact angle. The power-law dependence of the contact line velocity on contact angle has been verified experimentally for the spreading of pure liquids [6,7], with the power-law index m taking on values in the range of 1 to 3. In Eqs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the contact angle during capillary rise does change. There have been several experiments that have measured the dynamic contact angles as a function of capillary number (for instance, Hamraoui and Nylander, 2002;Hoffman, 1975;Rillaerts and Joos, 1980 ). In this section, we refer to Heshmati and Piri (2014) 's experiment.…”
Section: Capillary Rise Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%