Pathways to Fiscal Reform in the United States 2014
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028301.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamic Economic Effects of a U.S. Corporate Income Tax Rate Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, leaner depreciation will immediately make investment more expensive, while a lower CIT rate only partly offsets this effect. Simulation models for Europe and the US indeed find that scrapping depreciation allowances in exchange for CIT rate reduction in a revenue-neutral fashion will generally deter investment (Bettendorf et al, 2010;Diamond et al, 2014). Note also that the scope for base broadening through leaner depreciation allowances in Japan is limited.…”
Section: Leaner Depreciation Allowancesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, leaner depreciation will immediately make investment more expensive, while a lower CIT rate only partly offsets this effect. Simulation models for Europe and the US indeed find that scrapping depreciation allowances in exchange for CIT rate reduction in a revenue-neutral fashion will generally deter investment (Bettendorf et al, 2010;Diamond et al, 2014). Note also that the scope for base broadening through leaner depreciation allowances in Japan is limited.…”
Section: Leaner Depreciation Allowancesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10 While Bhattarai and others (2017) finance the tax reform with budget deficits (though no further details are provided), Benzell, Kotlikoff and LaGarda (2017) consider the replacement of a tax on capital returns (dubbed a "corporate income tax") by a combination of a consumption tax plus a labor subsidy (to proxy a DBCFT, see below for more). Diamond and al. (2014) provide significantly lower output estimates from a reduction in CITs which is financed by the reduction of investment tax incentives such as investment tax credit or accelerated depreciation allowances.…”
Section: Cit Reforms In General Equilibrium Models: a Review Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gazette 17A/2013) which provides for a six percent (6%) increase in the corporate tax rate. This policy option was not expected 5 and is in stark contrast to the positions announced by the parties in power 6 , the official positions of the associations of the largest productive classes 7 (ACCI,SEV, GSEVEE) as well as the prevailing modern theoretical and empirical approaches that a reduction of the tax cost is more desirable by businesses (Neubig 2006) and would have an immediate positive impact on growth, while over time it would increase revenue by broadening the tax base (Diamond et al, 2014). Moreover, the important Deferred Tax Asset Positions of banks 8 are of particular significance in view of their recapitalization because including DTA in regulatory capital reduces their need for additional funds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%