1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90647-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamic structure model for ion transport in glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
235
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
235
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to an increase of the activation energy by 0.08 eV, i.e.Ẽ a = 0.66 eV. This value compares very well with the experimental value of 0.59 eV as obtained from conductivity experiments [34]. In Fig.6 we show that all curves can be superimposed on each other by substituting t by…”
Section: Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This corresponds to an increase of the activation energy by 0.08 eV, i.e.Ẽ a = 0.66 eV. This value compares very well with the experimental value of 0.59 eV as obtained from conductivity experiments [34]. In Fig.6 we show that all curves can be superimposed on each other by substituting t by…”
Section: Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Actually, the presence of the release of mismatches and thus the readaption of sites in the glassy phase has been already postulated in the Dynamic Structure Model 21 . Others suppose that the adaption of a site is definitively fixed during the glass transition 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Various structural models have been proposed to explain the MAE based on a homogeneous spatial cation distribution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, 3),4) extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) 5), 6) analysis, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. 7) Ingram et al 1),5), 6) reported that the MAE is caused by the disturbance created when one type of alkali ion moves to sites previously occupied by another type of alkali ion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%