2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02874-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamical renaissance in neuroscience

Abstract: Although there is a substantial philosophical literature on dynamical systems theory in the cognitive sciences, the same is not the case for neuroscience. This paper attempts to motivate increased discussion via a set of overlapping issues. The first aim is primarily historical and is to demonstrate that dynamical systems theory is currently experiencing a renaissance in neuroscience. Although dynamical concepts and methods are becoming increasingly popular in contemporary neuroscience, the general approach sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paradigm considers the brain as a dynamical system (as opposed to a modular, information processing computer). 1 This dynamical renaissance in understanding nervous systems has been compellingly described by Favela (2020). Although the methods are not particularly new -e.g., differential equationsunfolding developments make these approaches central to the defense of the "dynamical hypothesis" in neuroscience.…”
Section: Brains and Minds As Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm considers the brain as a dynamical system (as opposed to a modular, information processing computer). 1 This dynamical renaissance in understanding nervous systems has been compellingly described by Favela (2020). Although the methods are not particularly new -e.g., differential equationsunfolding developments make these approaches central to the defense of the "dynamical hypothesis" in neuroscience.…”
Section: Brains and Minds As Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm considers the brain as a dynamical system (as opposed to a modular, information processing computer). This dynamical renaissance in understanding nervous systems has been compellingly described by Favela (2020). Although the methods are not particularly new -e.g.…”
Section: Brains and Minds As Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Hodgkin and Huxley (1952) explicitly pointed out, their equations lacked a physical basis. There is some disagreement among philosophers about how we should interpret the explanatory merits of the model ( Levy, 2014 ; Craver and Kaplan, 2020 ; Favela, 2020a ), but what is clear is that the Hodgkin and Huxley model is a major achievement that is not a mechanistic explanation of the action potential. We return to issues such as these below.…”
Section: Philosophical Theories Of Understanding Integrate Scientific...mentioning
confidence: 99%