The dynamics of inter-regional collaboration: an analysis of co-patenting

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The paper at hand investigates how co-patenting over distance develops when aggregating inventive activities on a regional level. That means, the object of analysis is a link between two regions in contrast to other studies, where links between two individuals or firms are investigated. We analyse which regional characteristics influence the creation and continuation of such links. The main focus lies on different types of distance. The approach adds a dynamic view to the existing, often static literature about collaboration behaviour. The regressions are done for all patentrelevant industries in Germany. We find that several distance types decrease -as expected -the likelihood of link creation but also -not in all cases expected -of link continuation. Terms of use: Documents in

Innovative partnerships resulting from high-skilled emigration

“…Existing literature on joint patenting has identified some important factors that contribute to joint patenting activity. Von Proff and Brenner (2014) find distance between cross-country co-inventors to be critical. Distance between countries can occur via physical distance, social distance, cultural distance and the like.…”

The evolutionary patterns of intercity co‐invention networks in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China: A comparative analysis based on the technological intensity of industry

“…Second, we establish a bridge for the study of intercity innovation networks within different technological intensity industries and evolutionary economic geography. Although lots of literature stress the importance of scientific, geographic, economic and social proximities in interregional collaboration in a broad way (von Proff & Brenner, 2014; Marek et al., 2017; Mitze & Strotebeck, 2019), whether proximity relate to technological intensity of the industry is under‐researched. Likewise, with regard to general regional absorptive capacities, we argue that the impact of socio‐institutional environment on these two networks may also be distinct in light of the characteristics of the industry.…”