2017
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/l4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Very High Alfvén Mach Number Shocks in Space Plasmas

Abstract: Astrophysical shocks, such as planetary bow shocks or supernova remnant shocks, are often in the high or veryhigh Mach number regime, and the structure of such shocks is crucial for understanding particle acceleration and plasma heating, as well inherently interesting. Recent magnetic field observations at Saturn's bow shock, for Alfvén Mach numbers greater than about 25, have provided evidence for periodic non-stationarity, although the details of the ion-and electron-scale processes remain unclear due to lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To subtract the solar wind contribution, we use and interpolate data from the SWIA fine mode designed to track and measure solar wind beam ions at a particular subset of energies and directions (Halekas et al, 2015). Quasiperiodic enhancements in the magnetic field and ion density are seen in panels (a) and (b), with an average period of ∼30 s, comparable to the upstream proton gyroperiod 24.2 s. Similar periodic modulations have been observed upstream of Earth and Saturn, which were attributed to the reformation of the bow shock at high Mach numbers (Sulaiman et al, 2015; Sundberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To subtract the solar wind contribution, we use and interpolate data from the SWIA fine mode designed to track and measure solar wind beam ions at a particular subset of energies and directions (Halekas et al, 2015). Quasiperiodic enhancements in the magnetic field and ion density are seen in panels (a) and (b), with an average period of ∼30 s, comparable to the upstream proton gyroperiod 24.2 s. Similar periodic modulations have been observed upstream of Earth and Saturn, which were attributed to the reformation of the bow shock at high Mach numbers (Sulaiman et al, 2015; Sundberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Near the shock, the solar wind is slowed down and incident ions undergoing reflection have speeds lower than the pristine solar wind, false|Vfalse|<false|boldVup·trueboldn^false|, which could explain why reflected ions are often inside the dashed ellipse. The reflection may also be nonspecular (Sundberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, three-dimensional (3D) [29], and some two-dimensional (2D) [30,31], particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations of quasiperpendicular high-M A shocks demonstrate strong amplification of the upstream magnetic field due to the ion-ion filamentation/Weibel instability [32,33], which results from the interaction of upstream and shock-reflected ions. The mediation of high-M A shocks by the Weibel instability is also confirmed by laboratory experiments [34] and in situ measurements of the Earth's bow shock at M A ≃ 39 [35]. In this Letter, we discuss a mechanism of magnetic field amplification that is based on a realistic description of perpendicular nonrelativistic high-M A shocks and can explain the correlation between field strength and M A observed with Cassini at Saturn's bow shock.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Collisionless plasmas support energetic structures that are not captured by a single-fluid MHD theory and that can play a vital role in the thermalization of plasma. Examples are magnetosonic solitons [6,7] and the beams of shock-reflected particles ahead of the bow shock [8], which enforce a non-stationarity of the shock [9][10][11][12]. Single-fluid MHD simulations are nevertheless used to solve problems in collisionless plasma based on the argument that they can describe the plasma dynamics on a large enough scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%