“…Over the last decades, many approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping were proposed, among which the application of remote sensing associated with GIS modelling techniques became the most popular and effective method (Alexander, 2008;Carrara et al, 1991;Dai and Lee, 2002;Guzzetti et al, 1999;Lee, 2005;Mantovani et al, 1996;Mansouri Daneshvar, 2014;Xu et al, 2012a). The most commonly used methods for landslide susceptibility mapping include logistic regression (Ayalew and Yamagishi, 2005;Bai et al, 2010;Manzo et al, 2013;Ozdemir and Altural, 2013), weights of evidence (Althuwaynee et al, 2012;Regmi et al, 2010), analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Kayastha et al, 2013;Komac, 2006;Mansouri Daneshvar, 2014;Yalcin, 2008), frequency ratio (FR) (Guo et al, 2015;Lee and Pradhan, 2007;Li et al, 2017;Mohammady et al, 2012), support vector machine (SVM) (Marjanović et al, 2011;Su et al, 2015), decision tree (Nefeslioglu et al, 2010;Saito et al, 2009) and artificial neural network (ANN) (Caniani et al, 2008;Catani et al, 2005;Conforti et al, 2014;Ermini et al, 2005;Pradhan and Lee, 2009). These methods have been proven capable of mapping the locations that are prone to landslides; however, some shortcomings still exist in these methods, which reduce the efficiency of these susceptibility methods when applied individually (Tien Bui et al, 2012;Umar et al, 2014).…”