The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America 2005
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521812894.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economic Consequences of Independence in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 The pioneering article in this current, frequently cited, is Coatsworth (1978); the author repeats his arguments in Coatsworth (1998). See also Engerman and Sokoloff (1997); Prados de la Escosura (2006) follows Coatsworth in his emphasis on the destructive impact of Independence, and the same tendency can be found in other contributions to these two volumes, in particular in the treatment of institutions by Dye (2006). Prados de la Escosura (2009) somewhat modifies his earlier negative view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 1 The pioneering article in this current, frequently cited, is Coatsworth (1978); the author repeats his arguments in Coatsworth (1998). See also Engerman and Sokoloff (1997); Prados de la Escosura (2006) follows Coatsworth in his emphasis on the destructive impact of Independence, and the same tendency can be found in other contributions to these two volumes, in particular in the treatment of institutions by Dye (2006). Prados de la Escosura (2009) somewhat modifies his earlier negative view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Curious, their notion of independence as «deglobalising»: was the Spanish Empire, with all its regulations, hurdles and exclusions, really more «globalized» than were its separate territories after a process that all contemporaries, those for and those against, considered an opening up? The argument is shared by Prados de la Escosura (2006): «openness to trade and factor inflows were reduced». Do these authors have Dr Francia's Paraguay in mind?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political, fiscal, currency and market fragmentation created economic balkanization in post-independence Latin America (Irigoin 2003;Prados 2006;Grafe and Irigoin 2006). Balkanization probably had a smaller impact in Latin America than in Africa since inter-colonial trade in the Americas was relatively modest, largely due to imperial trade monopolies and high transport costs.…”
Section: Lost Decades Balkanization and Anti-market Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Latin America and Africa also suffered from economic balkanization which stemmed from fiscal, currency and market fragmentation. It might be supposed that balkanization in Latin America (Irigoin 2003;Prados 2006;Grafe and Irigoin 2006) would have had a smaller impact than in Africa since inter-colonial trade in the Americas had been modest or forced by colonial fiat. 8 However, protectionism driven by warrelated revenue needs diminished the positive impact that could have been expected from the destruction of the Iberian commercial monopolies.…”
Section: Lost Decades Balkanization and Anti-market Policymentioning
confidence: 99%