The economic development of regions in Ukraine: with tests on the territorial capital approach

Getzner, Michael; Moroz, Serhiy

doi:10.1007/s10663-021-09521-w

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the dynamic multipliers are depicted in Fig 1 and demonstrate that the cumulative effect of the per capita cost of war on per capita GDP shows that the positive asymmetric shock from the per capita cost of war causes the per capita GDP to increase, while its negative asymmetric shock reduces the per capita GDP. The results are in line with the argument of Luca [ 92 ] on the wider spectrum of effects of war on the economy, but closely confirm the latest findings of Getzner and Moroz [ 93 ] relevant to the swift response of the economy to war in Ukraine. The results of the cumulative effect of per capita final household consumption expenditure indicate a counter-example, showing that growth does not significantly respond to the positive asymmetric shock of per capita final household consumption expenditure, while it positively responds to the negative shock.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Assessing the asymmetric war-growth nexus: A case of Afghanistan

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the war-growth nexus in Afghanistan, a country where war-torn acts inform resource allocation. Employing the asymmetric ARDL, dynamic multipliers, and asymmetric causality techniques, the initial results confirm the existence of a long-run asymmetric nexus amid predictors. The asymmetric ARDL results indicate that a positive asymmetric shock from the per capita cost of war reduces per capita GDP—that is, economic growth—while a negative asymmetric shock from the per capita cost of war increases growth in the short and long run. Moreover, the findings reveal that per capita capital investment, per capita energy consumption, per capita household consumption, per capita remittance, per capita foreign direct investment, population growth, and inflation rate have significantly asymmetric effects on growth, highlighting non-monotonic impacts in scale and magnitude. The results of the asymmetric causality technique by bootstrap confirm that there is an asymmetric bidirectional causality between growth, per capita cost of war, per capita household consumption, per capita capital investment, and per capita foreign direct investment, while expanding only unidirectional causality with per capita remittance, population growth, and inflation rate. Based on the findings, the study concludes by offering relevant policy recommendations.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Assessing the asymmetric war-growth nexus: A case of Afghanistan

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ukraine's European integration strategy should also include nature conservation goals accepted by the European Union. Ukraine is an industrially developed country with a high population density, and this is fully relevant to Dnipropetrovsk region (Getzner & Moroz, 2022). In such circumstances, the creation of a large strictly protected area becomes a very difficult task due to imperfect legislation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How much space is needed for biodiversity conservation?

Trifanova,

Zadorozhna,

Novitsky

et al. 2023

Biosys. divers.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EU's 2030 Biodiversity Strategy and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework call for 30% coverage of land and sea protected areas and strict protection for 10% of land area to prevent and reverse biodiversity loss. Ukraine has declared its aspiration to integrate into the European Union and must back up its statements with action and do everything to achieve such ambitious conservation goals. Like many European countries, Ukraine faces great challenges on this route. The significant level of anthropogenic transformation of the territories makes it very difficult to find new areas to expand the boundaries of the nature reserve fund. The practical steps to create nature reserves are significantly limited by legal mechanisms that guarantee land users' ownership of the relevant land plots. An important task in nature conservation is to develop indicators that can clearly and easily demonstrate the importance of areas for conservation. Such tools are necessary to convince policy makers and land users of the need to protect the relevant areas. The indicators of importance for biodiversity conservation should be scale-independent, as both large areas and small areas are important for conservation. In this article, we consider the case of a project to expand the boundaries of the Dnipro-Orylskiy Nature Reserve by adding five areas directly adjacent to it. The number of species included in the various Red Data Lists was chosen as an indicator of the conservation value of the territory. The species-area relationship was used to assess the role of scale. The number of species on the Red Lists was considered instead of the classical relationship that considers the total number of species in a community. The normalised deviation from the regression relationship was considered as an indicator of the conservation value of the respective area, which is statistically independent of the area of the site. The different Red Lists are compiled according to different criteria, so the indicator of conservation value for each Red List focuses on the relevant conservation aspect. The results of the conservation value assessment can be presented graphically, which clearly demonstrates the role of the respective areas in the maintenance of biological diversity. The proposed algorithm for assessing conservation value can be applied to a wide range of environmental protection tasks. In terms of further research, it is important to assess the role of ecosystem function assessment in the design of protected areas.

show abstract

“…We have identified a number of studies based on simple single-equation models. For example, Getzner and Moroz (2022), used panel data-based models to investigate the role of different aspect of territorial capital on regional development in Ukraine. Chugaievska et al (2020) use a gravity growth model to simulate labour productivity trajectories across Polish and Ukrainian NUTS 2 regions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional Policy in Ukraine – Importance for Post-War Reconstruction

Mogiła,

Bradley,

Zaleski

2024

Eur. XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our analysis sets out a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of regional development programmes in Ukraine. Specifically, we investigate to what extent the Ukrainian approach to regional development policy resembles the successful approach taken by the EU programmes of Cohesion Policy in the post-2004 New Member States. In addition, drawing on initial versions of Ukrainian national and regional models, we illustrate how the bottom-up regional approach initiated in Ukraine needs to be co-ordinated with a top-down national perspective that identifies and distinguishes national development objectives from specifically regional objectives. Such methodologies, suitably adapted, will be required during post-war reconstruction.

show abstract

The economic development of regions in Ukraine: with tests on the territorial capital approach

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

Assessing the asymmetric war-growth nexus: A case of Afghanistan

Assessing the asymmetric war-growth nexus: A case of Afghanistan

How much space is needed for biodiversity conservation?

Regional Policy in Ukraine – Importance for Post-War Reconstruction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About