1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-7012(97)00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economics of partnership sourcing versus adversarial competition: a critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, counter-arguments advocate the benefits of an open competitive process: better prices; lower risk, as poor suppliers can more easily be replaced; enhanced quality through suppliers' learning and innovation, driven by a desire to win future contracts; and finally, it is argued that trust can develop, especially if repeat business is sought (Parker and Hartley, 1997;Erridge and Greer, 2002).…”
Section: Developments In Uk Government Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, counter-arguments advocate the benefits of an open competitive process: better prices; lower risk, as poor suppliers can more easily be replaced; enhanced quality through suppliers' learning and innovation, driven by a desire to win future contracts; and finally, it is argued that trust can develop, especially if repeat business is sought (Parker and Hartley, 1997;Erridge and Greer, 2002).…”
Section: Developments In Uk Government Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst partnership sourcing does not necessarily lead to single sourcing (Lamming, 1993), it is accepted that there will be a reduction in the number of suppliers. Parker and Hartley (1997) raise the concern that this may lead to suppliers behaving opportunistically, clearly an abuse of the trust relationship advocated. Alternatively, buyers may possess greater economic power compared with their suppliers, producing unequal power in the partnership.…”
Section: Developments In Uk Government Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some firms form partnerships and alliances with suppliers as a strategy for competitive advantage [13,15,19,25,32,39], while others tackle this challenge by involving their suppliers early in the product development phase [3,10,14,29]. A growing number of high-tech firms (such as computer, semiconductor, communication, and electronics firms) have embraced new approaches, such as postponement and mass customization [18,22], to the management of their new product development, design, manufacturing, and supply chain management activities.…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Tennessee Knoxville] At 15:31 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing 'adversarial competition' for contracts with 'mutually beneficial partnerships' has become a fashionable means of procuring services in the private sector since the 1980s (Lamming, 1993;Cox and Hines, 1997;Parker and Hartley, 1997). Where adversarial relationships are considered to create barriers to innovation and knowledge transfer, some form of 'relationship contracting' may have benefits over traditional competitive bidding.…”
Section: The Economics Of Contractingmentioning
confidence: 99%