2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ecophysiology of Sprattus sprattus in the Baltic and North Seas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a corollary, calculating selection-indices for predators do not necessarily reflect active behaviour but spatial heterogeneity of prey distribution in relation to the preferred depth of a predator. Field data obtained during GLOBEC-Germany on clupeids and scyphomedusae such as the vertical habitat utilisation and zooplankton diets (Barz and Hirche, 2005;Bernreuther, 2007;Peck et al, this volume), confirm the conceptual modes of zooplankton habitat utilisation developed in the present study. In the following, we briefly discuss the potential roles of gelatinious (syphomedusae) and fish (clupeid) as potential competitors/predators with/ on zooplankton with respect to depth specific habitat utilisation and abundance of zooplankton.…”
Section: Ecological Consequences Of Zooplankton Vertical Habitat Partsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As a corollary, calculating selection-indices for predators do not necessarily reflect active behaviour but spatial heterogeneity of prey distribution in relation to the preferred depth of a predator. Field data obtained during GLOBEC-Germany on clupeids and scyphomedusae such as the vertical habitat utilisation and zooplankton diets (Barz and Hirche, 2005;Bernreuther, 2007;Peck et al, this volume), confirm the conceptual modes of zooplankton habitat utilisation developed in the present study. In the following, we briefly discuss the potential roles of gelatinious (syphomedusae) and fish (clupeid) as potential competitors/predators with/ on zooplankton with respect to depth specific habitat utilisation and abundance of zooplankton.…”
Section: Ecological Consequences Of Zooplankton Vertical Habitat Partsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…7). At the same (summer) water temperatures, field and modeled estimates of C MAX by sprat larvae are also between 40 and 50 % M D d −1 but mass-specific growth rates of larvae are higher (Peck et al 2012). The gross growth efficiency (K 1 ) of 35 mm L S post larval sprat in this study (~26.9 % based upon energy contents) was well within the range of values reported for larvae of other teleosts (Houde and Zastrow 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Line-filled symbols are groups of fish fed at less than maintenance (0 growth) levels and were not used in the linear regression (filled points only) but were included in the non-linear regression. The bottom panel displays growth gross efficiency (%) for all groups fed above maintenance levels (post-larval) sprat have comparable rates of feeding while the latter displays a lower growth rate (Peck et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the boundary of its physiological performance curve an adult fish is thus forced to budget between survival and reproductive capacity [23]. Therefore, in a heterogeneous environment a species' reproductive potential may exhibit strong variations spatially as well as temporally [19,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%