“…We assessed overall ROBs as high for nine quasi-experimental studies [ 63 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 71 , 72 , 73 ] and moderate for six studies [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 70 ] due to the blinding of outcome assessors and potential sources of knowledge of the intervention received in bias arising from the measurement of outcomes. However, by item, it was judged that the risk of bias was all low ROB for baseline confounding, selection of participants, classification of intervention, deviation from intended interventions, missing data, and selection of reported results.…”