2009
DOI: 10.1080/15512160903272160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Campaign Internship on Political Efficacy and Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have found positive impacts on political efficacy, but these studies usually involve courses that are either about politics and policy or tie the service-learning component back to government (Button, 1973;Hamilton and Zeldin, 1987;Morgan and Streb, 2001;Sylvester, 2010;Wilson, 1974). Others have found little to no impact on political efficacy, even among courses about politics (Corbett, 1977;Kahne and Westheimer, 2006;Mariani and Klinkner, 2009;Newmann and Rutter, 1983). Kahne and Westheimer's (2006) research on service-learning and political efficacy actually suggests that some forms of service-learning, such as those that challenge the status quo and fail to achieve change, can lower levels of political efficacy.…”
Section: Political Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have found positive impacts on political efficacy, but these studies usually involve courses that are either about politics and policy or tie the service-learning component back to government (Button, 1973;Hamilton and Zeldin, 1987;Morgan and Streb, 2001;Sylvester, 2010;Wilson, 1974). Others have found little to no impact on political efficacy, even among courses about politics (Corbett, 1977;Kahne and Westheimer, 2006;Mariani and Klinkner, 2009;Newmann and Rutter, 1983). Kahne and Westheimer's (2006) research on service-learning and political efficacy actually suggests that some forms of service-learning, such as those that challenge the status quo and fail to achieve change, can lower levels of political efficacy.…”
Section: Political Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active-learning activities take many forms, including service-learning exercises and internships, mock-trials, classroom debates, and simulations (see Archer and Miller 2011;Mariani and Klinkner 2009;Shellman and Turan 2006, 19-20), and promote the development of civic engagement in a variety of ways. Firstly, active learning helps students learn more effectively (Bonwell and Elison 1991;Raymond and Sorenson 2008;Shellman 2001), as studies indicate that active-learning techniques help students better understand political concepts (Baranowski 2006;Stice 1987) and complex political ideas (Cammarano and Fowler 1997;Smith and Boyer 1996), and are of particular benefit to students who start out with low levels of political awareness (Beaumont et al 2006).…”
Section: Civic Engagement Active Learning and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that internships and service-learning projects can promote student learning and political engagement (Elder, Seligsohn, and Hofrenning 2007;Eyler et al 2001;Freie 1997;Mariani and Klinkner 2009;Morgan and Streb 2001). However, these types of active-learning exercises have a downside in that they require a considerable investment of time and resources on the part of instructors and students.…”
Section: Civic Engagement Active Learning and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some specific interventions purposefully designed to develop college student political engagement include promoting "civic talk" in dormitories and residential life spaces (Klofstad 2010), building community-based discussions in general education courses (Schamber & Mahoney 2008), connecting volunteering activities more closely with voting experiences through campaign internships (Mariani & Klinker 2009), and designing multi-class global decision making simulations (Levintova, Johnson et al 2011).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%