2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a severe health shock on work behavior: Evidence from different health care regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…wave t, t − 1or t − 2). Smith (2004) and Datta Gupta et al (2011) identify severely ill people in a similar way. We define the second group of households to have a 'minor health condition' if neither the key person nor the partner are severely ill, but at least one of them is admitted to the hospital during the last three waves.…”
Section: Lmr and Cakmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…wave t, t − 1or t − 2). Smith (2004) and Datta Gupta et al (2011) identify severely ill people in a similar way. We define the second group of households to have a 'minor health condition' if neither the key person nor the partner are severely ill, but at least one of them is admitted to the hospital during the last three waves.…”
Section: Lmr and Cakmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Estimating meaningful effects of the impact of health on labour supply is, however, complex: issues such as health and economic activity being jointly determined, unobserved preferences, justification bias in survey self-reports of health status, and health-related selection into employment are typically difficult to overcome. An additional challenge is that the design and operation of pension, social benefit and welfare systems, as well as the structure of the labour market and the organisation of health and social care services all contribute to shaping labour supply decisions in response to a significant change to health (Garcia Gomez, 2011, Cai et al, 2014, Datta Gupta et al, 2011. This is particularly pertinent given the profound impact the recent recession has imparted on the structure of labour markets (Immervol et al, 2011, Jenkins et al, 2012, Elsby et al, 2011, 2016 and the fiscal policy response leading to significant changes in welfare provision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datta Gupta et al (2015) shows that older men (between 55 and 64 years of age) diagnosed with cancer are 9.8 percentage points more likely to not work than non-cancer survivors two years after diagnosis. Bradley et al (2005) and Bradley et al (2007) show that older men (with a mean age of 56) who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer are 10 percentage points less likely to work in the 6 months following prostate cancer diagnosis than healthy controls.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%