1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1999.tb00062.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a sodium lauryl sulfate‐free dentifrice on patients with recurrent oral ulceration

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) is the most commonly used detergent in dentifriceS. Recent reports have suggested that it may exacerbate conditions with compromised epithelial integrity. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of an SLS‐free dentifrice and an SLS‐containing dentifrice on recurrent oral ulceration (ROU). DESIGN: A double‐blind crossover clinical trial was carried out during which subjects used an SLS dentifrice for 8 weeks and an SLS‐free dentifrice for 8 weekS. Each phase was p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these were relatively simple dentrifices in which SLS was included with abrasive, humectant, fluoride and flavouring and the differences may reflect the mode of application, tissue structure or the absence of TCN or zinc from the formulation. The choice of ventral tongue for our study reflected a wider investigation of the possible role of SLS in recurrent apthous ulceration (Healy et al, 1999), a disease primarily restricted to non-keratinised oral mucosa and the use of post mortem tissue was influenced by the quantity of tissue required. The suitability of such tissue for permeability studies has previously been validated (Lesch et al, 1989), but clearly it would be interesting to establish whether SLS or SLS/TCN/Zn mixtures had a similar effect on keratinised human oral mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these were relatively simple dentrifices in which SLS was included with abrasive, humectant, fluoride and flavouring and the differences may reflect the mode of application, tissue structure or the absence of TCN or zinc from the formulation. The choice of ventral tongue for our study reflected a wider investigation of the possible role of SLS in recurrent apthous ulceration (Healy et al, 1999), a disease primarily restricted to non-keratinised oral mucosa and the use of post mortem tissue was influenced by the quantity of tissue required. The suitability of such tissue for permeability studies has previously been validated (Lesch et al, 1989), but clearly it would be interesting to establish whether SLS or SLS/TCN/Zn mixtures had a similar effect on keratinised human oral mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proposed that SLS might erode the oral mucin layer, exposing the underlying epithelium, thereby making the individual more susceptible to RAS. This theory still needs further clarification, because it has also been demonstrated that use of SLS-free toothpastes did not affect development of new lesions in RAS patients 52, 53 .…”
Section: Predisposing Etiologic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supposed adverse effect of SLS does not reflect any increased oral retention of SLS (Fakhry‐Smith et al , 1997). However, while another study also suggested that SLS‐free dentifrice might reduce the number of ulcers that patients with RAS might develop (Chahine et al , 1997), a large double‐blind study did not observe any significant change in the frequency or severity of RAS (Healy et al , 1999). In view of the widespread use of SLS in dentifrices it seems unlikely that this agent truly predisposes to, or causes, most RAS.…”
Section: Local Factors Predisposing To Rasmentioning
confidence: 99%