2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1829-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a supersaturated calcium phosphate mouth rinse on the development of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation

Abstract: In this randomized study, the addition of CP mouth rinse to standard of care did not improve the frequency, duration or severity of the most common acute toxicities during and early after (chemo)radiation. There is currently no evidence supporting its standard use in daily practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SCPR administered for the treatment of OM in patients receiving RT (with or without CT) for H&N cancer, there was 1 RCT [30] showing no efficacy. There was also 1 comparative study showing ineffectiveness [31].…”
Section: Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Rinse: Rt-ct-prevention Guimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SCPR administered for the treatment of OM in patients receiving RT (with or without CT) for H&N cancer, there was 1 RCT [30] showing no efficacy. There was also 1 comparative study showing ineffectiveness [31].…”
Section: Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Rinse: Rt-ct-prevention Guimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive professional support will provide the patient with greater confidence and cooperation that will positively reflect in the final treatment outcome. 6…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we can quickly cite and define the main complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. 6…”
Section: Mini Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies used active control agents (soybean or fluoride) and possibly biased outcomes ( Papas et al, 2003 ; Lin et al, 2010 ; Lin et al, 2006 ). One study transferred four participants to the treatment group, potentially overcounting outcomes in the exposed group (misclassification differential bias) ( Lambrecht et al, 2013 ). One study transferred patient files to the sponsor who then monitored outcomes (conflict of interest) ( Buntzelet al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%