1965
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of acetylcholine upon mammalian motor nerve terminals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
2

Year Published

1968
1968
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the quantal content of end-plate potentials is reduced in the presence of ACh (Ciani & Edwards, 1963;Hubbard et al 1965). Similar observations were obtained with bullfrog sympathetic ganglia in our recent studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that the quantal content of end-plate potentials is reduced in the presence of ACh (Ciani & Edwards, 1963;Hubbard et al 1965). Similar observations were obtained with bullfrog sympathetic ganglia in our recent studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…It may be the membrane of the nerve terminal endings (cf. Volle & Koelle, 1961;Koelle & Koelle, 1959; Koelle, 1961Koelle, , 1962 or the membrane of a more proximal part of the preganglionic nerve terminals (Hubbard, Schmidt & Yokota, 1965). In any case,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding is difficult to reconcile with the proposed cholinergic recurrent excitatory pathway to motoneurones (Matsurra, 1971), although it is conceivable that recording from the spinal roots might not have detected small responses generated in the motoneurone dendrites. The fact that unmyelinated nerve terminals of the primary afferents are unresponsive to acetylcholine and carbachol suggests that the acetylcholine sensitivity observed in some unmyelinated fibres and terminals (Armett & Ritchie, 1960;Hubbard, Schmidt & Yokota, 1965;Koketsu & Nishi, 1968) does not apply to all nerve fibres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased magnesium concentration An excess concentration of magnesium ions impairs neuromuscular transmission in two ways: it decreases transmitter release from motor nerve endings (del Castillo & Engbaeck, 1954;Dodge & Rahamimoff, 1967) and it stabilizes the postjunotional membrane, thereby depressing its excitability (Engbaeck, 1947;del Castillo & Engbaeck, 1954). Magnesium ions also prevent the depolarization of motor nerve terminals produced by acetylcholine (Hubbard, Schmidt & Yokota, 1965).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%