2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on symptom burden and quality of life over time; a preliminary prospective observational study using individual data of patients aged ≥ 70 with early stage invasive breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, these analyses have either focused on younger patients, where the risk/benefit ratio is different, or addressed the impact of breast cancer treatments (and not specifically of chemotherapy) on QoL in this age group. Our findings are consistent with a previous study in 109 patients aged 70 or older, of whom 57 received adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nonetheless, these analyses have either focused on younger patients, where the risk/benefit ratio is different, or addressed the impact of breast cancer treatments (and not specifically of chemotherapy) on QoL in this age group. Our findings are consistent with a previous study in 109 patients aged 70 or older, of whom 57 received adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our analysis also demonstrates that chemotherapy has a significant negative impact at 6 months on QoL, which is a meaningful endpoint in the context of a more limited survival benefit and increased risk of toxicities in this population. However, this effect resolves at 12 months consistent with previous findings in smaller or younger cohorts of patients 33,34 and is described in a more extensive analysis performed on this patient cohort. 18 A key strength of this study is that patients were recruited from a broad range of academic and general centres across the UK, and were likely to reflect contemporary practice and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, both the EORTC QLQ‐C30 Physical Functioning (PF) Scale and two of the GA measures, the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), can be used to assess the physical functioning of a patient with cancer. In a previous study involving a group of older patients with cancer (Quinten et al., 2018), a strong correlation was reported between baseline ADL and iADL on the one hand and the EORTC QLQ‐C30 scales related to not only physical functioning but also global health status (GHS) and role functioning on the other. Similarly, an earlier study (Wedding, Röhrig, et al., 2007) reported that the EORTC GHS scale was significantly associated with iADL in a heterogeneous group of older patients with cancer when prognostic clinical and socio‐demographic variables were adjusted for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%