The effect of adjuvants on spray droplet size from hydraulic nozzles

Abstract

Background When spraying simple liquids through a hydraulic nozzle, the mechanisms that affect breakup into droplets have recently been described. However, it is unknown how the droplet size distribution changes when surfactant‐based adjuvants are added to the spray. Results When spraying different surfactant‐based solutions containing commercial adjuvants, the breakup of the different liquids behaves in the same way as for water‐only sprays, but the droplet sizes are smaller. By replacing the equilibrium surface tension with the dynamic surface tension at a surface age of ~20 ms, the volume mean droplet size variation with the Weber number, flow rate and nozzle geometry follows the predictions established for pure water sprays. When we rescale the droplet size distribution with the mean droplet size, all distributions collapse onto a single curve and can be described by a compound Gamma function. Conclusion Addition of a number of surfactant‐based adjuvants to an agricultural spray is observed to lead to a slight decrease in the volume mean droplet size. We show that the effects of these adjuvants on the drop size can be understood by taking into account the nozzle geometry, the flow rate, the liquid and air densities and the dynamic surface tension of the surfactant solutions at a surface age of approximately 20 ms. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Reducing pesticide spraying drift by folate/Zn2+ supramolecular hydrogels

“…Current changes in the physical and chemical properties of pesticide liquids mainly involve the addition of chemical adjuvants to reduce drift 31 . Sijs et al 32 . pointed out that adding some surfactant adjuvants to agricultural sprays could lead to a slight decrease in droplet size, and studied the mechanism behind these effects.…”

“…Current changes in the physical and chemical properties of pesticide liquids mainly involve the addition of chemical adjuvants to reduce drift. 31 Sijs et al 32 pointed out that adding some surfactant adjuvants to agricultural sprays could lead to a slight decrease in droplet size, and studied the mechanism behind these effects. Stefan et al 33 changed spray parameters, such as nozzle pressure and geometry, and fluid parameters, such as viscosity and surface tension, to study the internal mechanisms that determine droplet size distribution.…”

Low Acyl Gellan as an Excipient to Improve the Sprayability and Mucoadhesion of Iota Carrageenan in a Nasal Spray to Prevent Infection With SARS-CoV-2

“…However, a 1% (w/v) gellan dispersion, which displayed the same viscosity profile as carrageenan, still sprayed significantly better, suggesting viscosity is not a good predictor of spray coverage for these systems. Surface tension, which plays a key role in film destabilization and droplet formation during spraying ( 48 , 49 ), also showed no obvious correlation with spray coverage, as the 1% (w/v) gellan, 0.5% (w/v) carrageenan, and mixed system, despite having similar surface tension values, all displayed significantly different spray coverage values to each other.…”

Spatially-resolved characterization of oil-in-water emulsion sprays

“…Modulation of droplet size distributions in sprays is of crucial importance for a broad range of industries (Mugele and Evans, 1951;Lefebvre and McDonell, 2017). In particular, agrochemical application is frequently carried out via sprays, and the droplet size distribution of such sprays needs to be controlled carefully to avoid droplet entrainment in wind resulting in spray drift (Bilanin et al, 1989;Holterman et al, 1997;Reichenberger et al, 2007;Teske et al, 2009), while ensuring appropriate penetration of the spray into the crop canopy (Zhu et al, 2002;Sijs and Bonn, 2020) and plant wetting (Lake, 1977). One widely applied spray drift mitigation strategy involves utilizing a two-phase, oil-in-water emulsion as an adjuvant towards producing larger droplets or mitigating fine droplet formation in sprays (FOCUS, 2007;Hoffmann et al, 2008;Qin et al, 2010).…”