“…Potential sources of DEC in this population may therefore be human or animal fecal matter. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] As for the genetic convergence between the two isolates (13 and 18), 80% were that the isolation (13), which is due to the phylogenetic group (A) and did not give a result for the serotype, this may be due to the presence of new patterns that have not been studied or because the methods of serotyping O-do not always indicate the exact pathogenicity of E. coli strains, and resistance to 5 antibiotics (Nakamura et al, 2021).Isolation (18), which is belong to the phylogenetic group (F), which owns the chuA gene and it included the serotype (O25:K11) and the percentage of genetic convergence between isolates (9,14,31) and isolates (13,18) by 88% and isolated from Al-Alawi Teaching Hospital. The fifth type, which includes each of the previously mentioned isolates (9,14,31,13,18) and isolates (2,7,20,5,26), includes the two isolates (2,7), the isolation (2) belongs to the phylogenetic group (F), which has chuA gene and belongs to the serotype (O142:K86).Isolation (7) belongs to the phylogenetic group (E), which has genes (TrpBA, arpA, ChuA), did not give a serotype, and the genetic convergence rate is 80%, both of which are transmitted through contaminated food, animals are the main reservoirs of many foodborne pathogens (Moxleyet al, 2020).The isolation (20) belongs to the phylogenetic group F, which has a gene (chuA), did not give a serotype, and resistance to 5 antibiotics, and the percentage of convergence is 88% between it and isolates (2,7) and the convergence rate between the two isolates (5,21) is 90%, as the isolation (5) belongs to the phylogenetic group (E), which included the serotype (O25:K11) and has the genes (TrpBA, arpA, ChuA, TspE4c2, yjaA), while the isolation (21) belongs...…”