The Effect of Antipyretic Therapy upon Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized, Prospective Study

Schulman, Carl I.; Namias, Nicholas; Doherty, James; Manning, Ronald J.; Li, Pamela; ELHaddad, Ahmed Magdy; Lasko, David; Amortegui, Jose D.; Dy, Christopher J.; Dlugasch, Lucie; Baracco, Gio; Cohn, Stephen M.

doi:10.1089/sur.2005.6.369

Cited by 205 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were extracted as a result of the systematic review conducted for this CQ 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379. All six RCTs assessed mortality rates, one assessed ICU‐free survival days, four examined the length of ICU stay, and two examined the rates of complication from infection.…”

Section: Cq15: Body Temperature Regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

Nishida

Ogura

Egi

et al. 2018

Acute Medicine & Surgery

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and PurposeThe Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG 2016), a Japanese‐specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in February 2017 in Japanese. An English‐language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese‐language version.MethodsMembers of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine were selected and organized into 19 committee members and 52 working group members. The guidelines were prepared in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) creation procedures. The Academic Guidelines Promotion Team was organized to oversee and provide academic support to the respective activities allocated to each Guideline Creation Team. To improve quality assurance and workflow transparency, a mutual peer review system was established, and discussions within each team were open to the public. Public comments were collected once after the initial formulation of a clinical question (CQ), and twice during the review of the final draft. Recommendations were determined to have been adopted after obtaining support from a two‐thirds (>66.6%) majority vote of each of the 19 committee members.ResultsA total of 87 CQs were selected among 19 clinical areas, including pediatric topics and several other important areas not covered in the first edition of the Japanese guidelines (J‐SSCG 2012). The approval rate obtained through committee voting, in addition to ratings of the strengths of the recommendation and its supporting evidence were also added to each recommendation statement. We conducted meta‐analyses for 29 CQs. Thirty seven CQs contained recommendations in the form of an expert consensus due to insufficient evidence. No recommendations were provided for 5 CQs.ConclusionsBased on the evidence gathered, we were able to formulate Japanese‐specific clinical practice guidelines that are tailored to the Japanese context in a highly transparent manner. These guidelines can easily be used not only by specialists, but also by non‐specialists, general clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, clinical engineers, and other healthcare professionals.

show abstract

Section: Cq15: Body Temperature Regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

Nishida

Ogura

Egi

et al. 2018

Acute Medicine & Surgery

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Schulman et al 2006 [47] Single center, unblinded, randomized trial of aggressive vs. permissive temperature management in febrile patients in a trauma ICU; n = 82…”

Section: Interventional Studies Of Fever Management In Icu Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fever Management in Intensive Care Patients with Infections

Young

Saxena

2014

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(Figure 1) Table 1. Quality of the included studies Randomized controlled trial (7,8)and one prospective observational study (9) were included finally in this review. In all the three studies, the treatment of fever was with acetaminophen in one group and no treatment givento the other placebo group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other cooling strategies including the cooling blanket were used in these studies when the patient's temperature exceeded specific range. One study evaluated non-surgical patients (8)and the others evaluated both surgical and medical patients (7,9). Two studies included patients with fever and infection at time of diagnosis (7,9), whereas the third study included patients with fever due to other reasons (8).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study evaluated non-surgical patients (8)and the others evaluated both surgical and medical patients (7,9). Two studies included patients with fever and infection at time of diagnosis (7,9), whereas the third study included patients with fever due to other reasons (8). Based on the analysis of these three trials,there is no difference in ICU and hospital length of stay between the group treated with acetaminophen and placebo ( Table 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Acetaminophen in critically ill patients with fever

Mahmood¹

2016

IOSRPHR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:-Background: Acetaminophen is one of the most treatments used to reduce the temperature in ICU patients. However, it is still unclear whether the use of acetaminophen improves patients' survival and hospital length of stay. This study aims to analyze the main literatures which studied the use of acetaminophen in ICU patients with fever due to infections or other non-infectious insults. Methods:Severaldatabases including Cochrane library database, Academic Search Complete, and PubMed were searched for studies on acetaminophen in ICU patients. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, adult human critically ill patients, treatment with acetaminophen in one arm and no treatment (placebo) in the other arm. The outcomes assessed were the ICU and hospital length of stay, mortality rate, ICU-free days and changes in temperature. Results:Two randomized control trials and one cohort study covering 32,408 patients were included. There wereno differences in ICU and hospital length of stay between the group treated with acetaminophen and placebo. In addition, the mortality rate did not differ between the two groups in patients with fever due to infection; however, a difference was shown in patients with fever due to non-infectious insults. Finally, there was a significant reduction in temperature in acetaminophen group compared to placebo. Conclusion: The use of acetaminophen for fever in critically ill patients was not associated with better outcome in terms of ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality ratecompared to placebo especially when the fever is due to infections.

show abstract

The Effect of Antipyretic Therapy upon Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized, Prospective Study

Abstract: Aggressively treating fever in critically ill patients may lead to a higher mortality rate.

Cited by 205 publications

References 10 publications

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

Fever Management in Intensive Care Patients with Infections

Acetaminophen in critically ill patients with fever

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About