The Effect of Attribution Retraining on the Academic Achievement of High School Students in Mathematics

Abstract

This research explored the effect of attribution retraining on high school students' academic performance in mathematics. The purpose of the study was to modify students' attributions regarding their achievement in mathematics and to teach them adaptive styles of attributions. Sixty-seven students from grades 10 and 11 conducted the Attribution Questionnaire as a pre-test. Twentytwo students were chosen for the experimental group based on their low score on the questionnaire. The control group which had been selected from the other 45 students was formed by matching their results in mathematics with that of the experimental group. Both the experimental and control groups were equal in number (n=22). The study used a pretest-posttest control group design with matching. Although, random assignment of subjects to experimental and control groups was not performed, the research design is a form of quasi-experimental one. The results demonstrated the positive effect of attribution retraining on students' academic achievement in mathematics and their attribution styles. In adopting adaptive attributions, students in the experimental group were able to view their success as a result of effort and ability rather than luck and task difficulty. It is recommended that the training applied in this research be implemented in developmental guidance programs.

FAIL Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Approaches to Academic Challenge and Responses to Failure in STEM Learning Environments

“…, 1971; Clifford et al. , 1988; Sukariyah and Assaad, 2015; Simpson and Maltese, 2017). These characteristics have important implications for how students cope with failures and are also related to the various constructs discussed earlier.…”

Academic self‐attributions for success and failure in mathematics and school refusal

“…According to Weiner (), the explanatory attributional style can be classified in accordance with three causal factors: (1) internal or external, depending on whether the cause is situated within the subjects or is external to them, (2) stable or unstable, in accordance with the persistence and variability of the cause, and (3) controllable or uncontrollable, according to the degree of control that is available to individuals to modify the consequences. The types of attributions that an individual assigns to a result will provoke an increase or decrease in the behavior and, as a result, will influence the expectations of success or failure that are associated with the behavior (Sukariyaha & Assaad, ). In the academic field, students tend to attribute their successes or failures to their ability (or lack thereof), to the effort (or lack thereof), and to external causes (which can be described as the difficulty of the task or even the luck that they have experienced during the activity) (Weiner, ).…”

Academic achievement among university students: The role of causal attribution of academic success and failure

“…If students with low grades believe that their low ability or intellectual capacity causes it, they would expect similar resultsin the future, potentially affecting their effort and enthusiasm in learning. Dweck (Sukariyah & Assaad, 2015) suggested encouraging students to attribute their failures to unstable factors (e.g., effort). This type of attribution would booststudents' effort, eventually improvingtheir academic achievement.…”