Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Audiences on the User Experience with Conversational Interfaces in Physical Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…focused on chatbots pertaining to the customer service and help-desk domain (e.g., Ashktorab et al, 2019); 14.5% of the papers (N=12) investigated chatbots that are used in healthcare and well-being, three thereof are specifically addressed to mental healthcare (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2017); 7.2% of the articles (N=6) examined pedagogical-educational chatbot (e.g., Tärning & Silvervarg, 2019); 3.6% of the papers (N=3) explored chatbots aimed at providing suggestions (e.g., Jin et al, 2019); 2.4% of the papers (N=2) examined chatbots that are thought to be used in the workplace supporting productivity (e.g., Kimani et al, 2019), while one paper (1.2% of the papers) focused on a Human Resource (HR) chatbot (Liao et al, 2018); two papers dealt with search chatbots (e.g., Avula et al, 2018); one paper focused on a chatbot that is meant to interact during art exhibitions (Candello et al, 2019). This shows how chatbots are versatile and are pervading many aspects of our everyday life (Table 5).…”
Section: Chatbots' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…focused on chatbots pertaining to the customer service and help-desk domain (e.g., Ashktorab et al, 2019); 14.5% of the papers (N=12) investigated chatbots that are used in healthcare and well-being, three thereof are specifically addressed to mental healthcare (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2017); 7.2% of the articles (N=6) examined pedagogical-educational chatbot (e.g., Tärning & Silvervarg, 2019); 3.6% of the papers (N=3) explored chatbots aimed at providing suggestions (e.g., Jin et al, 2019); 2.4% of the papers (N=2) examined chatbots that are thought to be used in the workplace supporting productivity (e.g., Kimani et al, 2019), while one paper (1.2% of the papers) focused on a Human Resource (HR) chatbot (Liao et al, 2018); two papers dealt with search chatbots (e.g., Avula et al, 2018); one paper focused on a chatbot that is meant to interact during art exhibitions (Candello et al, 2019). This shows how chatbots are versatile and are pervading many aspects of our everyday life (Table 5).…”
Section: Chatbots' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Michaud (2018) analyzed 1,023 texts sent to Edward, a chatbot for customer care in hospitality, and concluded that a chatbot must be able to respond appropriately to 'purely dialogue' interactions, such as "Hi" or "Thanks", to maintain an optimal user experience. Candello et al (2019) analyzed data from an art exhibit where visitors interacted in natural language with three chatbots representing book characters.…”
Section: Experiencing the Chatbotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a growing interest within the human-computer interaction community in understanding people’s experiences with voice assistants. Among several, one stream of research has focused on exploring the use of voice assistants in various contexts, such as different locations [ 15 , 16 ] or tasks [ 17 , 18 ]. Another stream of research has focused on investigating factors that constitute an effective conversation with voice assistants, either through personification [ 8 ] or using conversational cues [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, chatbot researchers currently have an unprecedented opportunity for real-world study of users [106], user motivations [14], and implications at scale. In consequence, knowledge on chatbot use has been gathered for a range of contexts-in the private sphere [87], at work [74], and in public spaces [17].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%