2002
DOI: 10.1080/00949650214263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of autocorrelation on the ewma maxmin tolerance limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, this is because the process approaches the independent setting, which is the setting that the k ‐factor in Equation was derived under. This behavior is comparable to the simulation results reported in Amin and Li and Knoth and Amin . However, here we have reported results from a more expansive set of simulation conditions such that the resulting figure gives a clear indication of the shape of this behavior.…”
Section: Adjusted Confidence Level and Coverage Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intuitively, this is because the process approaches the independent setting, which is the setting that the k ‐factor in Equation was derived under. This behavior is comparable to the simulation results reported in Amin and Li and Knoth and Amin . However, here we have reported results from a more expansive set of simulation conditions such that the resulting figure gives a clear indication of the shape of this behavior.…”
Section: Adjusted Confidence Level and Coverage Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the AR(1) model, Amin and Li proposed using the usual sample variance or the estimate of the true process variance. Let us consider a time series of length T .…”
Section: Tolerance Intervals For Autoregressive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See, for example, Box et al (1974), Vasilopoulos and Stamboulis (1978), Alwan and Roberts (1988), and Wardell et al (1992) to name just a few. Studies on control charts with autocorrelated data can also be found by, e.g., Wardell et al (1994), Faltin et al (1997), Lu and Reynolds (1999), Amin and Li (2002), and Knoth and Amin (2003). Woodall and Montgomery (1999), Stoumbos et al (2000) and Woodall (2000) provided discussions and future research issues in statistical process control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%