The effect of Between-Set Rest Intervals on the Oxygen Uptake During and After Resistance Exercise Sessions Performed with Large- and Small-Muscle Mass

Farinatti, Paulo; Neto, Antonio Gil Castinheiras

doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e318212e415

Cited by 40 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many studies have shown the effect of acute variables of WT on the EE, such as performance velocity 14 , rest interval 21 , load intensity 14 , number of sets 22 , number of repetitions 18 , training volume 23 and muscular mass involved 24 . Thus, it is worth mentioning that in the present study the experimental sessions were identical compared with the training variables, the only difference between the methods was the training design.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efeitos agudos de diferentes métodos de treinamento com pesos sobre o gasto energético em homens treinados

Aniceto¹,

Ritti‐Dias²,

Scott³

et al. 2013

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Weight training has been widely used as strategy of reduction and weight control, so the energy expenditure (EE) contributes significantly to this process. Objective: To compare the acute effects of the circuit method (CM) with the traditional method (TM) on the EE. Methods: This research had a randomized crossover design; the sample consisted of ten adult men recreationally trained aged between 18 to 29 years. There were two experimental sessions with seven-day wash out: in CM the exercises were performed by alternating segment in form of stations, during TM the exercises were performed in consecutive sets. Both training methods followed the same sequence of eight exercises with the same total work: 60% of 1RM, 24 sets/stations and ten repetitions. The collection of blood lactate was performed at rest and the every three sets/stations. The expired air was collected per 30 minutes before and ~31 minutes during all the training sessions. The aerobic exercise (AEEE, kj) and of rest interval (RIEE, kj) EEs were estimated by indirect calorimetry by measuring oxygen consumption and the anaerobic EE (AEE, kj) by blood lactate concentration ([La]). The total EE (TEE, kj) was recorded by the sum of AEE, RIEE and AEE. Results: Data showed that the AEE was greater in TM than the CM; however, the AEEE, RIEE and the TEE were not significantly different between the methods. The TM presented higher [La] than the CM. Conclusion: We conclude that the CM and TM produces similar EE during and post-workout, however, one realizes that the TM uses more anaerobic system than the MC.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efeitos agudos de diferentes métodos de treinamento com pesos sobre o gasto energético em homens treinados

Aniceto¹,

Ritti‐Dias²,

Scott³

et al. 2013

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally many studies discarded the �rst minutes of the EPOC, therefore overlooking its rapid phase even though approximately 1⁄3 of the total VO 2 recovery takes place during this period [39]. In the present paper, only �ve studies [16,22,26,27,34] assessed the EPOC immediately aer the end of RT.…”

Section: Methodological Issues In Epoc Analysismentioning

confidence: 88%

“…It is therefore important to standardize the rest intervals between sets and exercises to prevent assessment bias: short intervals result in high EPOC, but less EE within the exercise session. On the other hand, longer intervals result in lower EPOC, but greater EE during the session [16,34].…”

Section: Methodological Issues In Epoc Analysismentioning

confidence: 95%

“…We found only three studies investigating the speci�c in�uence of rest intervals between sets and exercises on EPOC magnitude and duration [12,22,34]. In general, the magnitude increased Haltom et al [12] 7M-T (27 ± 1 (1) eligibility criteria were speci�ed; (2) participants were randomly allocated to groups; (3) allocation was concealed; (4) groups were similar at baseline; (5) participants were blinded; (6) evaluators who administered the tests were blinded; (7) assessors were blinded; (8) measures of key outcomes (EPOC magnitude and duration and EE) were obtained from more than 85% of participants; (9) data were analyzed by intention to treat; (10) statistical comparisons between groups were conducted; (11) point measures and measures of variability were provided.…”

Section: In�uence Of Training �Ariables On the Epocmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More recently, our group [34] observed the effect of different rest intervals (1 min versus 3 min) on the EPOC measured during 90 min aer protocols with multiple sets and exercises engaging large and small muscle mass (leg press versus chest �y). e duration of the EPOC was about the same aer both leg press protocols (about 40 min), whereas aer the chest �y it was longer when the rest interval was shorter (40 min versus 20 min).…”

Section: Effect Of Rest Intervalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Influence of Resistance Training Variables on Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. Resistance training may in�uence the resting metabolic rate (RMR), which is desirable in weight management programs. However, its impact on excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) is yet to be de�ned. e study evaluated the contribution of resistance training variables to EPOC. Design. Studies published until November 2011 were systematically reviewed. Methods. MEDLINE, LILACS, SCIELO, Science Citation Index, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL databases were consulted. e methodological quality of studies was assessed by the PEDro 10-point scale. A total of 155 participants (54% men) aged between 20 ± 2 and 34 ± 14 years were observed by 16 studies (quality scores ranged from 5 to 7), which were organized according to treatment similarity (number of sets, intensity, rest interval, speed of movement, and exercise order). Results. Training volume seemed to in�uence both EPOC magnitude and duration, whereas workload in�uenced mostly the magnitude. Short rest intervals (<60 s) increased the EPOC magnitude, but not the overall energy expenditure. Conclusion. Resistance training with high intensity and volume, performed with short rest intervals (as in circuit training), probably have greater impact on EPOC. Methodological procedures, particularly time of post-exercise observation and RMR assessment, should be standardized to an appropriate quanti�cation of the actual in�uence of resistance training on EPOC.

show abstract

Full‐body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split‐body routine in well‐trained males: A randomized trial

Carneiro,

Nunes,

Souza

et al. 2024

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While significant progress has been made in understanding the resistance training (RT) strategy for muscle hypertrophy increase, there remains limited knowledge about its impact on fat mass loss. This study aimed to investigate whether full‐body is superior to split‐body routine in promoting fat mass loss among well‐trained males. Twenty‐three participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: full‐body (n = 11, training muscle groups 5 days per week) and split‐body (n = 12, training muscle groups 1 day per week). Both groups performed a weekly set volume‐matched condition (75 sets/week, 8–12 repetition maximum at 70%–80 % of 1RM) for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with differences only in the routine. Whole‐body and regional fat were assessed using DXA at the beginning and at the end of the study. Full‐body RT elicited greater losses compared to split‐body in whole‐body fat mass (−0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; p = 0.040), upper‐limb fat mass (−0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; p = 0.019), gynoid fat mass (−0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; p = 0.012), lower‐limb fat mass (−0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; p = 0.040), and a trend in interaction in android fat mass (−0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; p = 0.051), with large effects sizes (η2p ≥ 0.17). This study provides evidence that full‐body is more effective in reducing whole‐body and regional fat mass compared to split‐body routine in well‐trained males.

show abstract

The effect of Between-Set Rest Intervals on the Oxygen Uptake During and After Resistance Exercise Sessions Performed with Large- and Small-Muscle Mass

Cited by 40 publications

References 15 publications

Efeitos agudos de diferentes métodos de treinamento com pesos sobre o gasto energético em homens treinados

Efeitos agudos de diferentes métodos de treinamento com pesos sobre o gasto energético em homens treinados

Influence of Resistance Training Variables on Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review

Full‐body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split‐body routine in well‐trained males: A randomized trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About