2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of bioturbation in pelagic sediments: Lessons from radioactive tracers and planktonic foraminifera in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea

Abstract: Studies of recent environmental perturbations often rely on data derived from marine sedimentary records. These records are known to imperfectly inscribe the true sequence of events, yet there is large uncertainty regarding the corrections that should be employed to accurately describe the sedimentary history. Here we show in recent records from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, how events of the abrupt disappearance of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides sacculifer, and episodic deposition of the artificial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the creation of proxy carriers such as foraminiferal shells or alkenone molecules, a proportion of these are exported to and buried in the sediment. The upper few centimetres of marine sediments are typically mixed by burrowing organisms down to a depth of around 2-15 cm (Boudreau, 1998, 9.8 ± 4.5 cm, 1 SD) (Teal et al, 2010;Trauth et al, 1997, 8.37 ± 6.19 cm), although laminated sediments absent of bioturbation do exist. Marine sediment accumulation rates vary over many orders of magnitude (Sadler, 1999;Sommerfield, 2006) but rates at core locations used for climate reconstructions are typically of the order of 1-100 cm kyr −1 .…”
Section: Seasonal and Habitat Bias In The Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the creation of proxy carriers such as foraminiferal shells or alkenone molecules, a proportion of these are exported to and buried in the sediment. The upper few centimetres of marine sediments are typically mixed by burrowing organisms down to a depth of around 2-15 cm (Boudreau, 1998, 9.8 ± 4.5 cm, 1 SD) (Teal et al, 2010;Trauth et al, 1997, 8.37 ± 6.19 cm), although laminated sediments absent of bioturbation do exist. Marine sediment accumulation rates vary over many orders of magnitude (Sadler, 1999;Sommerfield, 2006) but rates at core locations used for climate reconstructions are typically of the order of 1-100 cm kyr −1 .…”
Section: Seasonal and Habitat Bias In The Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated from radiocarbon or from global distribution (Teal et al, 2010 where z is the number of discrete depths to be included.…”
Section: Input Climate Matrix (Climsignal)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequent physical and chemical disturbances caused by infauna can be defined as bioturbation sensu lato, e.g., Aller (1982). As geological records of changing environmental conditions are often assumed to represent monotonic changes with time, and ideally ones that can be sampled at high resolution to help understand rapid events and transitions, understanding of biota-induced physicochemical disturbances is indispensable for correct interpretation of past environments, e.g., Berger et al (1977), Trauth (1998Trauth ( , 2013, Meysman et al (2006a), Ridgwell (2007), Panchuk et al (2008), Canfield and Farquhar (2009), Hull et al (2011), Steiner et al (2016), and Kirtland Turner et al (2017). Numerical models of the appropriate processes involved represent invaluable tools in this effort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the general effect of bioturbation should also apply under conditions of incomplete mixing and the code could easily be modified to use a more complex bioturbation model (e.g., Guinasso and Schink, 1975;Steiner et al, 2016) to generate the weights used to sample the input 20 climate signal. We note that when sedimentation rates are low relative to mixing rates, more complex mixing models converge to the simple box type model that we employ here (Matisoff, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%